[Foundation-l] Edits by project and country of origin

[Alphax (Wikipedia email)]

Ray Saintonge wrote:
> daniwo59 at aol.com wrote:
> 
>> What I find especially interesting is not the native Asutralian languages,  
>> which have a handful of speakers only, but the fact that in India, over 99  
>> percent of people prefer to edit in English than in their native languages. It  
>> would be interesting to see the results once native languages are included in  
>> the sample. 
>>
> I agree.  The Indian situation is far more significant than the 
> Australian one.  It is understandable that there would be very little 
> participation from speakers of Australian Aboriginal languages because 
> each has such a tiny speaker base.  It is less understandable that 
> Indian languages with a million or more speakers have had so little 
> development.
> 
> When a person from India looking at Australian edits in other languages 
> than English presumes that we are talking about other European languages 
> this suggests that the influence of the Raj is still alive and well, and 
> that the educated people of India have bought into the idea that their 
> own native languages are somehow inferior.
> 

I would suggest that it's due to the caste system; the educated rich see
the native languages as being used by the lower castes and don't want
anything to do with them?

-- 
Alphax - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
Contributor to Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
"We make the internet not suck" - Jimbo Wales
Public key: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax/OpenPGP

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 569 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/attachments/20060905/7fa5221c/attachment-0001.pgp