[Foundation-l] Report from Frankfurt - October 2006

[Andrew Gray]

On 29/10/06, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/29/06, daniwo59 at aol.com <daniwo59 at aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > Actually, we have always had them. As a not fo profit in the United States,
> > we are required to have a mission statement, because we are accepting  money.
> > People have a right to know what they are giving money to, and that is  laid
> > out in the mission statement.
> >
>
> You can legally have informal ones (that is what Michael Snow's
> comments suggest exists at the moment)?

I think "placeholder" may be more accurate than "informal" -
incorporating with an official aim that says "to do good stuff in a
really really general way" and then going back to firm up the details
later.

-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk