[Foundation-l] Wikinews EN ArbCom

Nathan Carter magnaboy at westnet.com.au
Sun Mar 26 20:55:11 UTC 2006


Thankyou Erik :)

Erik Moeller wrote:

>The user in question originally opposed the ArbCom; a discussion
>followed. On http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews_talk:Arbitration_Committee
>, Amgine wrote in November 2005: "I'm going to assume, lacking
>opposition, that this proposed policy is in force then, and we should
>begin considering a slate of people who would be good nominations to
>serve." There were no further objections, and a public election
>followed; the user in question voted in this election in support of
>several candidates and posted no comments indicating that he opposed
>the existence of the Arbcom at that point.
>
>Therefore, should an ArbCom ruling require steward action, I would ask
>stewards to consider the ArbCom on the English Wikinews to be official
>policy as it was developed through an open consensus process. Should
>stewards, however, ask for a poll "ratifying" the ArbCom policy, I
>would also not object to such a poll being taken.
>
>Erik
>_______________________________________________
>foundation-l mailing list
>foundation-l at wikimedia.org
>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
>  
>



More information about the foundation-l mailing list