[Foundation-l] Sister Project Cooperation

[Ray Saintonge]

My apology for misunderstanding  the question.  I agree with you about 
the tagline.

Ec


- Essjay - wrote:

>I believe that the issue of concern has been confused: We're not worried
>about the articles, we're worried about the slogans that are used on the
>various main pages. Either Wikipedia is "the free encyclopedia" or it is
>not; it's not the place of Wikiquote to decide on a new tagline, any more
>than it is appropriate for Wikiquote to change the Wikipedia logo to another
>one. By the same token, it is not the place of Wikipedia to decide if
>Wikisource is "the free library" or not; whatever is the official slogan of
>Wikisource is what needs to be put in the little box on the main page that
>links to all the other projects.
>
>Essjay
>
>On 3/24/06, Birgitte Arco <birgitte_sb at yahoo.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>>Thus the article about Wikisource in Wikipedia
>>>should follow Wikipedia
>>>rules about articles in its principal namespace.  In
>>>that context
>>>Wikisource is no different than someone whose
>>>biography appears in
>>>Wikipedia.
>>>
>>Just to be clear here.  This is not about sister
>>project articles but rather the ~3-6 words that
>>accompany the logos at the bottom of the Main Page and
>>various other community pages.
>>
>>I agree Wikipedia articles about sister projects in
>>the article namespace should follow normal rules for
>>any such article.
>>    
>>