[Foundation-l] Throwing some data onto the flamefest fire (was: English Wikipedia ethnocentric policy affects other communities)
Birgitte SB
birgitte_sb at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 23 01:37:50 UTC 2006
--- Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/22/06, Birgitte SB <birgitte_sb at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Can you generate a list of non-blocked non-latin
> > usernames that are active editors?
>
> Yes
>
> [snip]
> > of blocking latin usernames started. To find
> > non-latin usernames that have been blocked by this
> > policy you can look through
> >
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Temporary_Wikipedian_userpages&from=Z
>
> The first one I checked...
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/%E8%97%A4%E4%BA%95%E7%8C%AB%E3%82%86%E3%81%86%E3%81%BE
>
> is blocked for vandalism on jawiki:
>
>
http://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E7%89%B9%E5%88%A5:Log&type=block&page=%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8%E8%80%85:%E8%97%A4%E4%BA%95%E7%8C%AB%E3%82%86%E3%81%86%E3%81%BE
>
> :)
>
> You might also enjoy the list of blocked users with
> non-ascii
> characters in their names at:
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gmaxwell/nonalphausers/blocked
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at wikimedia.org
>
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
I think we have a different idea of what active is.
Two edits that are six months old isn't active to me.
It appears from looking at the logs, the blocking of
non-Latin username became a regular practice in early
October. The non-latin reasoning was specifically
added to {{UsernameBlocked}} on Oct. 16. I think if
we have non-latin editors that are active since
September (to give a little room for error) that
would really mean something. I also think three edits
should have been enough to be noticed on RC and
blocked if this is the standard practice. Therefore
most non-latin editors with three edits since Sept.
should be blocked if my claim is true. I don't think
the existance un-blocked non-latin editors who were
only active before Sept is significant. But if you
believe a different time-period would be siginificant
please explain.
Birgitte SB
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list