[Foundation-l] Montenegrin request for new language wikipedia
Darko Bulatovic
mail at itam.ws
Fri Dec 1 03:19:38 UTC 2006
To others that find this interesting,
I have found that this decision is very biased, as it is based on
assumptions not on arguments. I have tried to communicate with members
of subcommittee but They found it unrelevant and made decision to deny
this request (you will find my attempt on this mailing list). The
explanation is colored by political vocabulary with no particular
reason, it is only driven on assumption - not real facts at least they
didn't show them.
On request page was started a "war" against Montenegrin wikipedia
where mostly Serbs voted against Montenegrin Wikipedia. Legitimate
votes, but Montenegrin votes was deleted and marked as sock puppets -
even it was not true. I don't understand why stewards dint check this
votes again, but on page you will find many accusation on my name that
stewards/Admin didn't try to clear. Why? I don't understand. I have
called them several times but with no success.
Our test wiki (wikii.itam.ws) was attacked several days by members of
meta wiki on Mediawiki website originated from Serbia, deleting our
pages and mocking on our State name changing it to Albania,etc. We lost
several days in fight against vandals and tried to talk with stewards
about what happen on meta request page, this was very difficult to us,
but stewards didn't reacted swift in this situation clearing up the
discussion there (maybe they did have some other work to do I don't
know). I have called them about 20 times. At end I was blocked by no
particular reason, and discussion was heated by some serbs which
political agitated and insulted some people from Montenegro. That made
reaction that leaded to page protection.
I have talked with stewards about my ban on meta and they agreed to
unblock me and to give me a chance to explain all on my talk
page(user:Ego_and_his_own). On which I was also false accused, but no
one reacted.
Page was on subcommittee "desk" almost a week before new policy was on
stage, but never less the request was judged on new policy, this is not
normal in common law or in common decision making rules. But never less
on that page request there was more than 5 people willing to contribute
to Montenegrin wikipedia, which is basic rule from new policy. In
discussion also was enough material to be positive to this request. At
least to ask for some clearance on some questions, but members of
committee didn't find this necessary.
I would like to see some of yours opinions regarding this issue as this
looks very strange to me.
Thank you
Darko Bulatovic
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list