[Foundation-l] Enforcing WP:CITE
Fred Bauder
fredbaud at ctelco.net
Wed Nov 30 12:23:29 UTC 2005
The problem is that the bulk of our content has no explicit source.
It may be correct and unchallenged, but no source is listed.
Additionally, a slightly more sophisticated level of vandalism would
simply list a spurious source. Beyond that lies referencing a source
which is known to be in error.
Fred
On Nov 29, 2005, at 10:58 PM, Brian wrote:
> In light of the recent USA Today article:
>
> In the same way that we are currently enforcing proper image tags
> using a bot, could we do the same with unsourced articles? Start
> out by placing {{unsourced}} in all the articles lacking sources,
> and then, if it is not sourced in a week, create something like the
> {{copvio}} page-replacer to hide the unsourced content (the entire
> article), explaining with a detailed message that the article must
> be thoroughly sourced.
>
> In my mind, at least, it doesn't seem like there should be any
> difference between enforcing sources for images and sources for
> articles. If anything we should be enforcing the latter more, since
> articles form the basis of the encyclopedia. I know this won't
> solve everything, but I think it should be a vital part of
> Wikipedia; since we do not know who edits an article, we need to
> know that it is based on information that we can verify ourselves.
>
> brian0918
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list