[ComProj] Logo

[Florence Devouard]

Why not simply using the community logo ?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Wikimedia_Community_Logo.svg

That was exactly what it was made for

ant

Martin Peeks wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> Guillaume Paumier wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> "Note that no derivative of the Wikimedia logo can be published without
>> prior approval from the Foundation."
>>
>>     
>
> That's the understanding I've always had, and I do try to steer clear of
> that logo for any purpose.
>
>   
>> Again, I don't understand why Comproj (an informal unofficial group of
>> users) wants to look like an official branch of the Wikimedia Foundation.
>>     
>
> Although I think that a logo can be justified on the basis of it giving
> us a visual identity, I agree with Guillaume that using the official
> wmf-logo might not be appropriate.  Perhaps any logo should be more
> focused towards communication - pending its licencing (which I don't
> want to check right now!), the "communications kite" shown on the
> Contact Us pages on many projects seems to be a good substitute.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Martin.
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ComProj mailing list
> ComProj at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj
>