[ComProj] ComProj pages on meta have been updated

[simonpedia]

*	Previous message: HYPERLINK
"http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/comproj/2007-November/000450.html"[Com
Proj] A new system for ComProj? (please read and comment) 
*	Next message: HYPERLINK
"http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/comproj/2007-November/000452.html"[Com
Proj] Meeting in an hour and a half 
*	Messages sorted by: HYPERLINK
"http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/comproj/2007-November/date.html#451"[
date ] HYPERLINK
"http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/comproj/2007-November/thread.html#451"
[ thread ] HYPERLINK
"http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/comproj/2007-November/subject.html#451
"[ subject ] HYPERLINK
"http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/comproj/2007-November/author.html#451"
[ author ] 

   _____  

Hello all,
 
Following the decisions on Wednesday I have changed the ComProj pages
around to meet our new, deformalised structure. I am tired and thus
probably haven't made things as clear as they should be so if someone
could take a look and neaten things up that would be great.
 
Let's see if this works :)
 
Sean
 

 

 

Hey Sean,

 

Just had a look. I’m totally exhausted too. Talk about mixing directories.
But I can see where you’re going. Goodoh.

Reading between the lines, we have been here. HYPERLINK
"http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ComProj"http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ComPr
oj

And now we’re here. HYPERLINK
"http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communication_Projects_Group"http://meta.wik
imedia.org/wiki/Communication_Projects_Group

So I guess this is what yuall discussed at the last IRC meeting although
there is no record yet.

 

Look I can only suggest to you that we’ve got to start thinking outside the
square(s). There comes a time where a wiki can’t be all things to all
people, and the comms tools wikipedians are offered (IRC, elists) are just
past their use bys.. It comes down to this. HYPERLINK
"http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communication_Projects_Group/Projects/Discus
sion_Outlets"http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communication_Projects_Group/Pro
jects/Discussion_Outlets I’m asking you to think from the “discussion
inlets” perspective, where every inlet will be based around some group or
committee.

 

Ultimately, just like a wiki, if you give people the right tools, and make
their use simple enough, and show them through using it, they’ll find their
own level.  Where a wiki has proved just so incredibly successful for
producing a library, we need something just as simple to use which supports
their communication, and by this I mean both the asynchronous stuff – where
I’ve pointed to sitepoint.com’s  forums and blogs as an example – but also
their real time comms, which range from an msg type tool all the way through
to accessgrid-type rooms.or meeting space a la HYPERLINK
"http://labspace.open.ac.uk/"http://labspace.open.ac.uk/ If it needs a
manual, forget it.

 

So as a starting point can I again suggest that we consider designing a
forum. The integration with instant messaging tools can be something which
is considered while it grows legs. And could we (me) see about getting a
sponsor (and development partner) for “it”, because the higher bandwidth
stuff will blow any budget even if it’s halfway as successful as Wikipedia.

 

All the best,

simonfj

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.33/1132 - Release Date: 15/11/2007
9:34 AM
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/comproj/attachments/20071116/39f6c68b/attachment.htm