[Commons-l] List moderator [was some spammish message]

[mike.lifeguard]

I was referring more to making the spam filter smarter. But I'm surprised we
have only one listmod - I agree redundancy is a good idea.

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex G [mailto:g1ggyman at gmail.com] 
Sent: July 29, 2008 5:44 AM
To: Wikimedia Commons Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Commons-l] List moderator [was some spammish message]

Yes, this is what I was referring to; that we have someone else (as
well as Tim) be a listmod in case anything pops up. I wasn't
suggesting we do thinks the wikien-l way; we're nowhere near big
enough (thankfully!) to be considering that.

Any ideas for a new listmod?

-Giggy

On 7/29/08, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/7/28 David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com>:
>
>> The list is basically unmoderated, which is a good way for it to be -
>> we don't want every message pre-screened, or even many of them. Even
>> slight active moderation, as on wikien-l, is a major pain in the
>> backside and a source of much angst and stupidity (I'm one of the
>> wikien listmods), and you really don't want that if at all avoidable.
>> So far I really don't think commons-l needs that.
>
>
> That said, multiple listmods are always a good idea.
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> Commons-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>