[Advocacy Advisors] non-free academic publishing licenses

Amgine amgine at wikimedians.ca
Sun Aug 3 05:18:20 UTC 2014


On Aug 2, 2014, at 20:25, Tisza Gergő <gtisza at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Amgine <amgine at wikimedians.ca> wrote:
> If we write up a clear ruling on Commons, stating that any STM licenses or other licenses with STM riders are not free and may not be uploaded to commons, this addresses our contributors. A friendly blog article explaining exactly why these are not-free again addresses our community. And both can then be cited by anyone who wants point out to STM  why these should not be promulgated.
> 
> The real motivation for providing truly open access would be a Wikipedia policy of preferring such sources when the alternatives are otherwise equally good. How easy it is to find the articles of a given journal online has major effect on its impact factor, and referencing it often in Wikipedia makes it easier to find, both directly, and by external links in the Wikipedia article namespace being a factor in Google rankings.
> 
> Apparently there was an attempt back in 2007 to create such policy, but it was abandoned:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Open_Access_(archived_proposal)


I could imagine an entire digression on encouraging projects to use open access references. It's not always easy to find the open access editions of articles. Most of my partner's research is available via open access, but you'd never know that from google scholar[1].

On another point, having a policy at a given wikipedia supporting open access research (and a growing number of governments require publicly funded research be published open access - pretty much 100% of the US National Institutes of Health research for example) only affects that specific wiki. Nice, but it would be nicer if it were a translingual effort.

Amgine

[1] http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=Saewyc&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/advocacy_advisors/attachments/20140802/618e8347/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Advocacy_Advisors mailing list