[Advocacy Advisors] Policy Issues Survey 2013

[James Salsman]

http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/advocacy_advisors/2013-August/000209.html
explains the use of the term, but does not suggest that the Foundation
is more interested in an NSA conformant to the principles of the
Fourth Amendment's requirements that no warrants shall issue without
probable cause and a list of the items to be searched and searched
for. I am hoping for further clarification on that and whether the
Foundation intends to ask Google and the other cloud providers for
information processing solutions which allows them to abide by the
Privacy Policy.

Sincerely,
James Salsman


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Marcin Cieslak <saper at saper.info> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, James Salsman wrote:
>
>> Amgine wrote:
>> >
>> >... You're okay with allowing parts of governments to browse/edit
>> > privately, but not make this service general to all?
>>
>> When I asked for universal private browsing, Foundation Legal staff
>> accused me of trying to frustrate the NSA.
>
> James, can you elaborate on that?
>
> Marcin Cieślak
> User:Saper
>
> _______________________________________________
> Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
> Advocacy_Advisors at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors