Welcome, Jan!
I start by agreeing with you, but there has to be a but.
I certainly agree that there would be a standard way to express a particular Wikidata statement. For new statements, there might be a default implied by the Property being added to the Wikidata Item or, if necessary, a choice between a small number. But as soon as the Property implies or connects to a different Item, there is a question about which might come first, even in a neutral context. Is it "the UK's Head of State is Queen Elizabeth II" or "Queen Elizabeth II is the UK's Head of State"? (Wikidata has Q9682 with position held (Property P39) connecting to (among others) Q9134365 (monarch of the United Kingdom) with subclass (P279) head of state (Q48352)... but I simplified.) On a page about her, [she] is Queen of the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth Realms but on a page about Canada, [the country's] queen (or monarch) is Queen Elizabeth II.
Anyway, in general, yes, "Bobby hit [a or the] ball with [a or the] bat". But if you're talking about the bat, it's likely to be "The bat Bobby hit a ball with" or "The bat that Bobby used to hit a ball" or "The bat with which Bobby hit a ball", according to the agreed style. And if you're talking about the notable ball and the not-so-notable Bobby: "The ball that was hit with the bat by Bobby".
And (agreeing with "no") no, we don't need to consider all the permutations of {Bobby, ball, bat, hum, hit, over the stadium, ...}, but we do need to know how we avoid considering so many and how we handle those which remain.
Best regards, Al. On Saturday, 25 July 2020, abstract-wikipedia-request@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list submissions to abstract-wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to abstract-wikipedia-request@lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at abstract-wikipedia-owner@lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Abstract-Wikipedia digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: Conjugation and Declension Functions (Jan Ainali)
Message: 1 Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 09:30:59 +0200 From: Jan Ainali ainali.jan@gmail.com To: "General public mailing list for the discussion of Abstract Wikipedia (aka Wikilambda)" <abstract-wikipedia@lists.wiki media.org> Subject: Re: [Abstract-wikipedia] Conjugation and Declension Functions Message-ID: <CAKwu9WF8B5f1dwzdisASnHrnEarJwaxL0iHu73CFUoX3j0cabw@mail.gm ail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Den lör 25 juli 2020 kl 01:07 skrev Adam Sobieski < adamsobieski@hotmail.com
:
When exploring how best to add the thematic relation of instrument to the agent-patient pair (e.g. adding “using the bat” to “Bobby hit the
ball”), I
observed that, for the same input grammatical arguments, there was a set
of
possible output paraphrases:
- “Bobby hit the ball using the bat”
- “Bobby, using the bat, hit the ball”
- “Using the bat, Bobby hit the ball”
I wondered: how might we be able to generate each?
Since we are generating text for an encyclopedia, do we need to be able to pick which one of them? I think we could have a manual of style that says that method 1. is the one we use. That simplifies the language not only for the reader, but also our task by not trying to be able to create all nuances of spoken language.
/Jan