We are approaching some interesting and project-specific topics. The natural language
generation output is desired to be specifically encyclopedic, with that involving a number
of established style guidelines. For instance, automatically-generated encyclopedia
articles should be neutral [1] and devoid of sentiment.
My opinion is that WP:SYNTH [2] should not be an obstacle to projects exploring Wikidata
reasoning [3]. My opinion is that guidelines intended for human contributors need not be
interpreted as applicable to sound, administrator-approved, mechanical reasoning
processes. My opinion is that natural language generation can generate encyclopedic
articles from both sourced and soundly derived statements.
There is also a difference between: (a) reasoning processes occurring on Wikidata data to
obtain soundly derived data, (b) processes of reasoning which appear in the rhetoric of
articles.
All that said, I don’t know the current status of projects exploring automated reasoning
with Wikidata [3].
Whether or not WP:SYNTH [2] applies to administrator-approved logical rules with which to
generate Wikidata content from other Wikidata content… perhaps an interested group of
participants could, at some point, create a wiki page for others to review and to make use
of towards a determination.
Also, another use of automated reasoning for Wikidata is that a system could use automated
reasoning to provide editors with candidate or potential statements for them to find
sources which support or oppose the statements… man-machine collaboration.
Best regards,
Adam
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Synthesis_of_p…
[3]
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Reasoning