Neil Harris wrote:
...
Thanks for letting me know.
Since dumps appear to be made incrementally on top of other dumps, there seems to be a real risk of errors being compounded on top of errors. Does anyone here know if there have been any attempts to validate the current enwiki full dump against the database? For example, by selecting
Erik Zachte validated the 20100130 and found it intact and inclusive of all expected changes.
If you do find any holes 20100130 then please let know.
--tomasz