Tran The Trung wrote:
The copyright-violating message clearly says that all user *must* discuss and reach a consensus before editing.
What I mean is that someone could regularly go in and add a space at the end of the line, or do something ostensibly harmless, like tweaking the source URL in Vi phạm bản quyền to have a # at the end, then removing it. For now, it won't be a problem, since we can easily monitor these types of changes and block them if it's really necessary, but when we start getting busier, it might not be practical to monitor these pages this way; someone making dummy edits like that would probably escape our attention, and the violating article wouldn't ever make it into the delete bin.
The {{Đang dịch 2}} will worth what Danny B. is asking for; but there are already other templates that can take benefit from {{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}. They are *automatic* image tag templates: when user upload "unkown"/"somewebsite" image, they will be expired. That's the original drive for me to ask for {{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}} ({{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}} is not applicable here).
I realize that you did get what you asked for originally, but Danny has changed the bug to ask for something that, in my opinion, is more flexible. I find no problem with using {{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}} in templates where it can be useful, but I'm just hoping that something like Danny's request gets answered eventually.