Hi everyone, 

I feel the asynchronous discussion prevents from a meaningful discussion to happen. 

Given the situation, I feel it would be appropriate for the board and the general counsel, who is the executive responsible for governance (and seems to be the person at the top of this reporting line), to answer questions from the community so that we can get specific answers and a bettwr understanding on these important issues. 

Also, it is my feeling that this should not involve María, as it's about the accountability of the sitting trustees and general counsel. 

Can we move forward with arranging this discussion?

Thank you in advance for helping moving that topic forward :)

Le jeu. 24 juin 2021 à 7:13 PM, Chris Keating <chriskeatingwiki@gmail.com> a écrit :

It is a good practice to create a 12 month waiting period before board members of non-profits can become a staff member/paid contractor/consultant.

A few people mentioned that their own orgs or committees have norms or policies around this (Chris, Philip, Tito); could you describe specifics that are in place now around the movement?

It's interesting that you mention norms and policies... Wikimedia UK's policy on this (1) for instance states 

"During the period of trusteeship, and for six months after leaving the board, no trustee may without the consent of the board accept any employed or remunerated consultancy position with, nor may offer remunerated consultancy services to:
  • WMUK. Family members of trustees are ineligible for the same period;
  • the Wikimedia Foundation;
  • any organisation with which WMUK has a recent financial connection (either as funder or as a recipient of funds or gifts in kind), where the connection is significant enough to both parties to give rise to a reasonable perception of a current conflict of interest."

This is rather more in-depth than the WMF's policy, at least so far as I can see. Though not so in-depth as the previous version of the policy, which also required seeking the approval of the UK's charity regulator.

Even so, the policy could permit this kind of situation if the Board decided to approve the arrangement. However, no sensible Board would do so, because of exactly the kind of reaction that you see in this thread.


(1) https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Trustee_Conflict_of_Interest_Policy#Employment_and_consultancy

Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/TGLXYLMGP5K2NRBDEEKIQXXRELYV6STK/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org