It is a good practice to create a 12 month
waiting period before board
members of non-profits can become a staff member/paid contractor/consultant.
A few people mentioned that their own orgs or committees have norms or
policies around this (Chris, Philip, Tito); could you describe specifics
that are in place now around the movement?
It's interesting that you mention norms and policies... Wikimedia UK's
policy on this (1) for instance states
"During the period of trusteeship, and for six months after leaving the
board, no trustee may without the consent of the board accept any employed
or remunerated consultancy position with, nor may offer remunerated
consultancy services to:
- WMUK. Family members of trustees are ineligible for the same period;
- the Wikimedia Foundation;
- any organisation with which WMUK has a recent financial connection
(either as funder or as a recipient of funds or gifts in kind), where the
connection is significant enough to both parties to give rise to a
reasonable perception of a current conflict of interest."
This is rather more in-depth than the WMF's policy, at least so far as I
can see. Though not so in-depth as the previous version of the policy,
which also required seeking the approval of the UK's charity regulator.
Even so, the policy could permit this kind of situation if the Board
decided to approve the arrangement. However, no sensible Board would do so,
because of exactly the kind of reaction that you see in this thread.