In addition to the above, let me add that the groups/lists which incorporate the involvement of enthusiasts in addition to the board members, should possibly be Wikimedia mailing lists and the discussions would be publicly visible as on the WikiJournal mailing list.Furthermore, Thomas has already reached out to a significant number of people while trying to form the board for WJS and WJH. He can possibly provide us with a common template message to reach out to prospective Wikiprojects and their participants to provide them with an impetus to form WikiJournals in their respective fields. A similar exercise could also be carried out beyond the Wiki-space wherein academic groups are reached out to.RegardsDiptanshuPlease do not print this e-mail unless you really need to._______________________________________________On 9 December 2017 at 18:22, Michaël Laurent <michael.laurent@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Diptanshu,I fully agree on all 3 points.BW MichaëlOn Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Diptanshu Das <das.diptanshu@gmail.com> wrote:_______________________________________________HiI was wondering how to popularise WikiJournals and to expand their reach. One way would be to identify probable niches and the respective WikiProject. For example, WikiJournal of Social Sciences could be formed and for that the community at WikiProject Sociology could be invited by leaving a note on their talk page. As a member of the WikiJournal Council, I could do that. Thereafter, we could evaluate the level of enthusiasm and can proceed accordingly. Thomas has done an excellent job by reorganising WikiJournal of Science and by starting the WikiJournal of Humanities. Possibly it is time to reach out to other prospective branches.The editorial board members of WikiJournal of Mediccine have been communicating and discussing amongst themselves through a closed Google group. Similar board specific groups have evolved for WJS and WJH. But this arrangement limits the scope of involvement of anybody who is not a part of the editorial board of the respective WikiJournal. I think that a parallel open group could be formed for each of the existing WikiJournals with all the editorial board members as participants, but with the open scope of any other enthusiast joining (as it happens in Wikipedia communities).I was also eager to draw the involvement of eminent contributors who could otherwise act as advisers for the journals. I would seek your involvement in the discussion I have started at https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal_of_Science#Editorial_board_vs_Advisory_boardThomas, if this emails is not reaching the members of WJS and WJH, I would be glad if you could initiate the discussion in the respective boards.RegardsDiptanshuPlease do not print this e-mail unless you really need to.
WikiJournal-en mailing list
WikiJournal-en@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikijournal-en
_______________________________________________
WikiJournal-en mailing list
WikiJournal-en@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikijournal-en
WikiJournal-en mailing list
WikiJournal-en@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikijournal-en
La Trobe Institute for Molecular
Science &
Hexima Ltd | Postdoctoral research fellow
Profiles at ResearchGate | LinkedIn | GoogleScholar | AltMetric | Wikipedia