On Jul 12, 2014 3:26 PM, "Erica Litrenta" <elitrenta elitrenta@wikimedia.org@ elitrenta@wikimedia.orgwikimedia.org elitrenta@wikimedia.org> wrote:

I didn't see this mentioned lately, so I thought I could put this link

here:

https https://analytics.twitter.com/:// https://analytics.twitter.com/

analytics.twitter.com/ https://analytics.twitter.com/

and the related article https

https://blog.twitter.com/2014/new-tweet-activity-dashboard-offers-richer-analytics :// https://blog.twitter.com/2014/new-tweet-activity-dashboard-offers-richer-analytics blog.twitter.com https://blog.twitter.com/2014/new-tweet-activity-dashboard-offers-richer-analytics /2014/new-tweet-activity-dashboard-offers-richer-analytics https://blog.twitter.com/2014/new-tweet-activity-dashboard-offers-richer-analytics (so now we should be able to tell better how well Wiki* tweets performed).

Was mentioned before but easy to miss.

-Jeremy

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Tilman Bayer" <tbayer tbayer@wikimedia.org@ tbayer@wikimedia.org wikimedia.org tbayer@wikimedia.org> Date: Jul 1, 2014 2:35 PM Subject: Re: [Social-media] Proposed SM for @WikiEval webinars (July 16) To: "Social media discussion list for Wikimedia projects" <social-media@ social-media@lists.wikimedia.orglists.wikimedia.org social-media@lists.wikimedia.org>

[1] I use short link versions on our account 90% of times because I think

it might track more clicks. Please feel free to comment on this! Would love to hear other views.

We usually avoid these so as to stay reasonably close to the privacy expectations people have from the wikis. (I'm not too familiar with ow.ly's capacities, but if they are similar to bit.ly, I could very well imagine this to be of practical relevance here, as in "oh look, that one person we know from Madagascar clicked on our link too".) For tracking click numbers only, Twitter's own stats features should be sufficient; we could share that number with you in this case.