Hey all,
We just published "Wikipedia Picks: disaster, trial by battle, and more" to the blog. URL:
*https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/ https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/*
Many thanks to Gary for writing this post, as well as to Ed, Andrew and Fabrice for editing.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):*
• Wikipedia Picks: five articles on disaster, trial by battle, and more (link) • "A notorious incident where a passenger ship sank during trip across the Atlantic, and few of the passengers survived ... Like #Titanic, but worse." • The senator sacrificed his career for a group of African-American soldiers. [+image] • That beard though. [+image]
*Facebook/Google+:*
• English Wikipedia editor Gary Greenbaum discusses five featured #Wikipedia articles—including a maritime disaster, a pioneer, and a horse trainer-turned-publisher. (link) • Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?
thanks, Joe
I wrote most of these, so I won't LGTM, but please note that specific images go with the third and fourth proposed tweets/posts.
--Ed
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikipedia Picks: disaster, trial by battle, and more" to the blog. URL:
*https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/ https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/*
Many thanks to Gary for writing this post, as well as to Ed, Andrew and Fabrice for editing.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):*
• Wikipedia Picks: five articles on disaster, trial by battle, and more (link) • "A notorious incident where a passenger ship sank during trip across the Atlantic, and few of the passengers survived ... Like #Titanic, but worse." • The senator sacrificed his career for a group of African-American soldiers. [+image] • That beard though. [+image]
*Facebook/Google+:*
• English Wikipedia editor Gary Greenbaum discusses five featured #Wikipedia articles—including a maritime disaster, a pioneer, and a horse trainer-turned-publisher. (link) • Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
That is a fun blog post. It reads like some of the more entertaining Signpost featured content reports.
Pine On Jun 26, 2015 9:34 PM, "Ed Erhart" eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
I wrote most of these, so I won't LGTM, but please note that specific images go with the third and fourth proposed tweets/posts.
--Ed
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikipedia Picks: disaster, trial by battle, and more" to the blog. URL:
*https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/ https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/*
Many thanks to Gary for writing this post, as well as to Ed, Andrew and Fabrice for editing.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):*
• Wikipedia Picks: five articles on disaster, trial by battle, and more (link) • "A notorious incident where a passenger ship sank during trip across the Atlantic, and few of the passengers survived ... Like #Titanic, but worse." • The senator sacrificed his career for a group of African-American soldiers. [+image] • That beard though. [+image]
*Facebook/Google+:*
• English Wikipedia editor Gary Greenbaum discusses five featured #Wikipedia articles—including a maritime disaster, a pioneer, and a horse trainer-turned-publisher. (link) • Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Yes, I think it’s a promising weekly series, that has the potential to serve two great goals: • surface interesting content on Wikipedia • get inside the mind of an active Wikipedia contributor
Both of these goals can serve our mission, but the second one interests me the most, because it can help build empathy and trust between readers and editors.
Nicely done, Ed and team!
BTW, here are the personal posts I just published. Feel free to use any of that copy, as you see fit :)
And I agree that we should also try promoting this story with individual images, as proposed in #3 and #4 below.
I also like the idea of using ‘Did you know’ posts more often, such as this one:
'Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?'
-f
________
Facebook:
Wikipedia Picks: five unusual and fascinating articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt, a top contributor of featured articles of Wikipedia. This is a new content experiment for the Wikimedia blog. What do you think of this weekly feature idea?
https://www.facebook.com/fabrice.florin/posts/10155735696325506?pnref=story
Twitter:
Wikipedia Picks: five great articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt. What do you think of this new feature?
https://twitter.com/fabriceflorin/status/614677634794926080
On Jun 26, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
That is a fun blog post. It reads like some of the more entertaining Signpost featured content reports.
Pine
On Jun 26, 2015 9:34 PM, "Ed Erhart" <eerhart@wikimedia.org mailto:eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote: I wrote most of these, so I won't LGTM, but please note that specific images go with the third and fourth proposed tweets/posts.
--Ed
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org mailto:jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: Hey all,
We just published "Wikipedia Picks: disaster, trial by battle, and more" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/ https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/
Many thanks to Gary for writing this post, as well as to Ed, Andrew and Fabrice for editing.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):
• Wikipedia Picks: five articles on disaster, trial by battle, and more (link) • "A notorious incident where a passenger ship sank during trip across the Atlantic, and few of the passengers survived ... Like #Titanic, but worse." • The senator sacrificed his career for a group of African-American soldiers. [+image] • That beard though. [+image]
Facebook/Google+:
• English Wikipedia editor Gary Greenbaum discusses five featured #Wikipedia articles—including a maritime disaster, a pioneer, and a horse trainer-turned-publisher. (link) • Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?
thanks, Joe
-- Joe Sutherland Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 tel:%2B44%20%280%29%207722%20916%20433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org mailto:Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org mailto:Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
We've posted:
FB: *https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153346183643346 https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153346183643346*
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/614789098289676288 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/614788993981542400
G+ Wikipedia: https://plus.google.com/+Wikipedia/posts/1ZtTC7K5si6 G+ Wikimedia: https://plus.google.com/108193079736330787108/posts/8u1J1hN2Ggk
On 27 June 2015 at 07:32, Fabrice Florin fflorin@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yes, I think it’s a promising weekly series, that has the potential to serve two great goals: • surface interesting content on Wikipedia • get inside the mind of an active Wikipedia contributor
Both of these goals can serve our mission, but the second one interests me the most, because it can help build empathy and trust between readers and editors.
Nicely done, Ed and team!
BTW, here are the personal posts I just published. Feel free to use any of that copy, as you see fit :)
And I agree that we should also try promoting this story with individual images, as proposed in #3 and #4 below.
I also like the idea of using ‘Did you know’ posts more often, such as this one:
'Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?'
-f
Facebook:
Wikipedia Picks: five unusual and fascinating articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt, a top contributor of featured articles of Wikipedia. This is a new content experiment for the Wikimedia blog. What do you think of this weekly feature idea?
https://www.facebook.com/fabrice.florin/posts/10155735696325506?pnref=story
Twitter:
Wikipedia Picks: five great articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt. What do you think of this new feature?
https://twitter.com/fabriceflorin/status/614677634794926080
On Jun 26, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
That is a fun blog post. It reads like some of the more entertaining Signpost featured content reports.
Pine On Jun 26, 2015 9:34 PM, "Ed Erhart" eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
I wrote most of these, so I won't LGTM, but please note that specific images go with the third and fourth proposed tweets/posts.
--Ed
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikipedia Picks: disaster, trial by battle, and more" to the blog. URL:
*https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/ https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/*
Many thanks to Gary for writing this post, as well as to Ed, Andrew and Fabrice for editing.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):*
• Wikipedia Picks: five articles on disaster, trial by battle, and more (link) • "A notorious incident where a passenger ship sank during trip across the Atlantic, and few of the passengers survived ... Like #Titanic, but worse." • The senator sacrificed his career for a group of African-American soldiers. [+image] • That beard though. [+image]
*Facebook/Google+:*
• English Wikipedia editor Gary Greenbaum discusses five featured #Wikipedia articles—including a maritime disaster, a pioneer, and a horse trainer-turned-publisher. (link) • Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
The 'did you know' post did very well on Facebook—over a thousand likes and views. We could try to turn the senatorial one into a DYK as well, like "Did you know ... that this senator sacrificed his career for a group of unjustly discharged African-American soldiers?"
It's not really an editorial comment, as the US government exonerated the soldiers in the 1970s.
--Ed
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
We've posted:
FB: *https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153346183643346 https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153346183643346*
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/614789098289676288 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/614788993981542400
G+ Wikipedia: https://plus.google.com/+Wikipedia/posts/1ZtTC7K5si6 G+ Wikimedia: https://plus.google.com/108193079736330787108/posts/8u1J1hN2Ggk
On 27 June 2015 at 07:32, Fabrice Florin fflorin@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yes, I think it’s a promising weekly series, that has the potential to serve two great goals: • surface interesting content on Wikipedia • get inside the mind of an active Wikipedia contributor
Both of these goals can serve our mission, but the second one interests me the most, because it can help build empathy and trust between readers and editors.
Nicely done, Ed and team!
BTW, here are the personal posts I just published. Feel free to use any of that copy, as you see fit :)
And I agree that we should also try promoting this story with individual images, as proposed in #3 and #4 below.
I also like the idea of using ‘Did you know’ posts more often, such as this one:
'Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?'
-f
Facebook:
Wikipedia Picks: five unusual and fascinating articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt, a top contributor of featured articles of Wikipedia. This is a new content experiment for the Wikimedia blog. What do you think of this weekly feature idea?
https://www.facebook.com/fabrice.florin/posts/10155735696325506?pnref=story
Twitter:
Wikipedia Picks: five great articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt. What do you think of this new feature?
https://twitter.com/fabriceflorin/status/614677634794926080
On Jun 26, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
That is a fun blog post. It reads like some of the more entertaining Signpost featured content reports.
Pine On Jun 26, 2015 9:34 PM, "Ed Erhart" eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
I wrote most of these, so I won't LGTM, but please note that specific images go with the third and fourth proposed tweets/posts.
--Ed
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikipedia Picks: disaster, trial by battle, and more" to the blog. URL:
*https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/ https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/*
Many thanks to Gary for writing this post, as well as to Ed, Andrew and Fabrice for editing.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):*
• Wikipedia Picks: five articles on disaster, trial by battle, and more (link) • "A notorious incident where a passenger ship sank during trip across the Atlantic, and few of the passengers survived ... Like #Titanic, but worse." • The senator sacrificed his career for a group of African-American soldiers. [+image] • That beard though. [+image]
*Facebook/Google+:*
• English Wikipedia editor Gary Greenbaum discusses five featured #Wikipedia articles—including a maritime disaster, a pioneer, and a horse trainer-turned-publisher. (link) • Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
With the related image and link, of course.
--Ed
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
The 'did you know' post did very well on Facebook—over a thousand likes and views. We could try to turn the senatorial one into a DYK as well, like "Did you know ... that this senator sacrificed his career for a group of unjustly discharged African-American soldiers?"
It's not really an editorial comment, as the US government exonerated the soldiers in the 1970s.
--Ed
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org
wrote:
We've posted:
FB: *https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153346183643346 https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153346183643346*
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/614789098289676288 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/614788993981542400
G+ Wikipedia: https://plus.google.com/+Wikipedia/posts/1ZtTC7K5si6 G+ Wikimedia: https://plus.google.com/108193079736330787108/posts/8u1J1hN2Ggk
On 27 June 2015 at 07:32, Fabrice Florin fflorin@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yes, I think it’s a promising weekly series, that has the potential to serve two great goals: • surface interesting content on Wikipedia • get inside the mind of an active Wikipedia contributor
Both of these goals can serve our mission, but the second one interests me the most, because it can help build empathy and trust between readers and editors.
Nicely done, Ed and team!
BTW, here are the personal posts I just published. Feel free to use any of that copy, as you see fit :)
And I agree that we should also try promoting this story with individual images, as proposed in #3 and #4 below.
I also like the idea of using ‘Did you know’ posts more often, such as this one:
'Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?'
-f
Facebook:
Wikipedia Picks: five unusual and fascinating articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt, a top contributor of featured articles of Wikipedia. This is a new content experiment for the Wikimedia blog. What do you think of this weekly feature idea?
https://www.facebook.com/fabrice.florin/posts/10155735696325506?pnref=story
Twitter:
Wikipedia Picks: five great articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt. What do you think of this new feature?
https://twitter.com/fabriceflorin/status/614677634794926080
On Jun 26, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
That is a fun blog post. It reads like some of the more entertaining Signpost featured content reports.
Pine On Jun 26, 2015 9:34 PM, "Ed Erhart" eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
I wrote most of these, so I won't LGTM, but please note that specific images go with the third and fourth proposed tweets/posts.
--Ed
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikipedia Picks: disaster, trial by battle, and more" to the blog. URL:
*https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/ https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/*
Many thanks to Gary for writing this post, as well as to Ed, Andrew and Fabrice for editing.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):*
• Wikipedia Picks: five articles on disaster, trial by battle, and more (link) • "A notorious incident where a passenger ship sank during trip across the Atlantic, and few of the passengers survived ... Like #Titanic, but worse." • The senator sacrificed his career for a group of African-American soldiers. [+image] • That beard though. [+image]
*Facebook/Google+:*
• English Wikipedia editor Gary Greenbaum discusses five featured #Wikipedia articles—including a maritime disaster, a pioneer, and a horse trainer-turned-publisher. (link) • Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Yeah, it's done really well! Thanks mostly to an accidental Game of Thrones reference. :)
It's a good idea for future examples of this feature.
Joe
On 28 June 2015 at 11:40, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
The 'did you know' post did very well on Facebook—over a thousand likes and views. We could try to turn the senatorial one into a DYK as well, like "Did you know ... that this senator sacrificed his career for a group of unjustly discharged African-American soldiers?"
It's not really an editorial comment, as the US government exonerated the soldiers in the 1970s.
--Ed
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org
wrote:
We've posted:
FB: *https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153346183643346 https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153346183643346*
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/614789098289676288 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/614788993981542400
G+ Wikipedia: https://plus.google.com/+Wikipedia/posts/1ZtTC7K5si6 G+ Wikimedia: https://plus.google.com/108193079736330787108/posts/8u1J1hN2Ggk
On 27 June 2015 at 07:32, Fabrice Florin fflorin@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yes, I think it’s a promising weekly series, that has the potential to serve two great goals: • surface interesting content on Wikipedia • get inside the mind of an active Wikipedia contributor
Both of these goals can serve our mission, but the second one interests me the most, because it can help build empathy and trust between readers and editors.
Nicely done, Ed and team!
BTW, here are the personal posts I just published. Feel free to use any of that copy, as you see fit :)
And I agree that we should also try promoting this story with individual images, as proposed in #3 and #4 below.
I also like the idea of using ‘Did you know’ posts more often, such as this one:
'Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?'
-f
Facebook:
Wikipedia Picks: five unusual and fascinating articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt, a top contributor of featured articles of Wikipedia. This is a new content experiment for the Wikimedia blog. What do you think of this weekly feature idea?
https://www.facebook.com/fabrice.florin/posts/10155735696325506?pnref=story
Twitter:
Wikipedia Picks: five great articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt. What do you think of this new feature?
https://twitter.com/fabriceflorin/status/614677634794926080
On Jun 26, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
That is a fun blog post. It reads like some of the more entertaining Signpost featured content reports.
Pine On Jun 26, 2015 9:34 PM, "Ed Erhart" eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
I wrote most of these, so I won't LGTM, but please note that specific images go with the third and fourth proposed tweets/posts.
--Ed
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikipedia Picks: disaster, trial by battle, and more" to the blog. URL:
*https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/ https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/*
Many thanks to Gary for writing this post, as well as to Ed, Andrew and Fabrice for editing.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):*
• Wikipedia Picks: five articles on disaster, trial by battle, and more (link) • "A notorious incident where a passenger ship sank during trip across the Atlantic, and few of the passengers survived ... Like #Titanic, but worse." • The senator sacrificed his career for a group of African-American soldiers. [+image] • That beard though. [+image]
*Facebook/Google+:*
• English Wikipedia editor Gary Greenbaum discusses five featured #Wikipedia articles—including a maritime disaster, a pioneer, and a horse trainer-turned-publisher. (link) • Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
I like the DYK approach, but the "sacrificed his career" angle could use some work. Can we use something a little more neutral?
Did you know this U.S. Senator lost re-election trying to clear the name of a battalion of Buffalo Soldiers?
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yeah, it's done really well! Thanks mostly to an accidental Game of Thrones reference. :)
It's a good idea for future examples of this feature.
Joe
On 28 June 2015 at 11:40, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
The 'did you know' post did very well on Facebook—over a thousand likes and views. We could try to turn the senatorial one into a DYK as well, like "Did you know ... that this senator sacrificed his career for a group of unjustly discharged African-American soldiers?"
It's not really an editorial comment, as the US government exonerated the soldiers in the 1970s.
--Ed
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
We've posted:
FB: *https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153346183643346 https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153346183643346*
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/614789098289676288 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/614788993981542400
G+ Wikipedia: https://plus.google.com/+Wikipedia/posts/1ZtTC7K5si6 G+ Wikimedia: https://plus.google.com/108193079736330787108/posts/8u1J1hN2Ggk
On 27 June 2015 at 07:32, Fabrice Florin fflorin@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yes, I think it’s a promising weekly series, that has the potential to serve two great goals: • surface interesting content on Wikipedia • get inside the mind of an active Wikipedia contributor
Both of these goals can serve our mission, but the second one interests me the most, because it can help build empathy and trust between readers and editors.
Nicely done, Ed and team!
BTW, here are the personal posts I just published. Feel free to use any of that copy, as you see fit :)
And I agree that we should also try promoting this story with individual images, as proposed in #3 and #4 below.
I also like the idea of using ‘Did you know’ posts more often, such as this one:
'Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?'
-f
Facebook:
Wikipedia Picks: five unusual and fascinating articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt, a top contributor of featured articles of Wikipedia. This is a new content experiment for the Wikimedia blog. What do you think of this weekly feature idea?
https://www.facebook.com/fabrice.florin/posts/10155735696325506?pnref=story
Twitter:
Wikipedia Picks: five great articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt. What do you think of this new feature?
https://twitter.com/fabriceflorin/status/614677634794926080
On Jun 26, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
That is a fun blog post. It reads like some of the more entertaining Signpost featured content reports.
Pine On Jun 26, 2015 9:34 PM, "Ed Erhart" eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
I wrote most of these, so I won't LGTM, but please note that specific images go with the third and fourth proposed tweets/posts.
--Ed
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikipedia Picks: disaster, trial by battle, and more" to the blog. URL:
*https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/ https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/*
Many thanks to Gary for writing this post, as well as to Ed, Andrew and Fabrice for editing.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):*
• Wikipedia Picks: five articles on disaster, trial by battle, and more (link) • "A notorious incident where a passenger ship sank during trip across the Atlantic, and few of the passengers survived ... Like #Titanic, but worse." • The senator sacrificed his career for a group of African-American soldiers. [+image] • That beard though. [+image]
*Facebook/Google+:*
• English Wikipedia editor Gary Greenbaum discusses five featured #Wikipedia articles—including a maritime disaster, a pioneer, and a horse trainer-turned-publisher. (link) • Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
I used the wording directly from the editor—sorry about that. Perhaps "Did you know ... that this US senator used his position to defend African American soldiers falsely accused of murder?" Same stipulation there—the second clause is neutral because all of the men were exonerated in the 1970s.
Best, --Ed
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Katherine Maher kmaher@wikimedia.org wrote:
I like the DYK approach, but the "sacrificed his career" angle could use some work. Can we use something a little more neutral?
Did you know this U.S. Senator lost re-election trying to clear the name of a battalion of Buffalo Soldiers?
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Yeah, it's done really well! Thanks mostly to an accidental Game of Thrones reference. :)
It's a good idea for future examples of this feature.
Joe
On 28 June 2015 at 11:40, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
The 'did you know' post did very well on Facebook—over a thousand likes and views. We could try to turn the senatorial one into a DYK as well, like "Did you know ... that this senator sacrificed his career for a group of unjustly discharged African-American soldiers?"
It's not really an editorial comment, as the US government exonerated the soldiers in the 1970s.
--Ed
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
We've posted:
FB: *https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153346183643346 https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153346183643346*
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/614789098289676288 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/614788993981542400
G+ Wikipedia: https://plus.google.com/+Wikipedia/posts/1ZtTC7K5si6 G+ Wikimedia: https://plus.google.com/108193079736330787108/posts/8u1J1hN2Ggk
On 27 June 2015 at 07:32, Fabrice Florin fflorin@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yes, I think it’s a promising weekly series, that has the potential to serve two great goals: • surface interesting content on Wikipedia • get inside the mind of an active Wikipedia contributor
Both of these goals can serve our mission, but the second one interests me the most, because it can help build empathy and trust between readers and editors.
Nicely done, Ed and team!
BTW, here are the personal posts I just published. Feel free to use any of that copy, as you see fit :)
And I agree that we should also try promoting this story with individual images, as proposed in #3 and #4 below.
I also like the idea of using ‘Did you know’ posts more often, such as this one:
'Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your right to demand a trial by battle?'
-f
Facebook:
Wikipedia Picks: five unusual and fascinating articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt, a top contributor of featured articles of Wikipedia. This is a new content experiment for the Wikimedia blog. What do you think of this weekly feature idea?
https://www.facebook.com/fabrice.florin/posts/10155735696325506?pnref=story
Twitter:
Wikipedia Picks: five great articles, recommended by guest editor Wehwalt. What do you think of this new feature?
https://twitter.com/fabriceflorin/status/614677634794926080
On Jun 26, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
That is a fun blog post. It reads like some of the more entertaining Signpost featured content reports.
Pine On Jun 26, 2015 9:34 PM, "Ed Erhart" eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
I wrote most of these, so I won't LGTM, but please note that specific images go with the third and fourth proposed tweets/posts.
--Ed
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Hey all, > > We just published "Wikipedia Picks: disaster, trial by battle, and > more" to the blog. URL: > > *https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/ > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/26/wikipedia-picks-disaster-battle/* > > Many thanks to Gary for writing this post, as well as to Ed, Andrew > and Fabrice for editing. > > Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as > needed. > > *Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):* > > • Wikipedia Picks: five articles on disaster, trial by battle, and > more (link) > • "A notorious incident where a passenger ship sank during trip > across the Atlantic, and few of the passengers survived ... Like #Titanic, > but worse." > • The senator sacrificed his career for a group of African-American > soldiers. [+image] > • That beard though. [+image] > > *Facebook/Google+:* > > • English Wikipedia editor Gary Greenbaum discusses five featured > #Wikipedia articles—including a maritime disaster, a pioneer, and a horse > trainer-turned-publisher. (link) > • Did you know ... that as late as 1818, English courts upheld your > right to demand a trial by battle? > > thanks, > Joe > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: > JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Katherine Maher Chief Communications Officer Wikimedia Foundation 149 New Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94105
+1 (415) 839-6885 ext. 6635 +1 (415) 712 4873 kmaher@wikimedia.org
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
We could also try to make an explicit Game of Thrones reference, if it's not too repetitive: "Oberyn Martell and the Mountain from *Game of Thrones* could have fought in a trial by battle as late as 1818," or "*Game of Thrones*' Tyrion could have requested a trial by battle as late as 1818."
*Game of Thrones* there would be linked to the show's page (that should drive up views).
Sorry, if I actually watched GoT I would have thought of this before.
--Ed
I'd probably be wary about doing this again for the same blogpost, but it's probably an idea for the future?
Joe
On 29 June 2015 at 05:08, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
We could also try to make an explicit Game of Thrones reference, if it's not too repetitive: "Oberyn Martell and the Mountain from *Game of Thrones* could have fought in a trial by battle as late as 1818," or "*Game of Thrones*' Tyrion could have requested a trial by battle as late as 1818."
*Game of Thrones* there would be linked to the show's page (that should drive up views).
Sorry, if I actually watched GoT I would have thought of this before.
--Ed
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Fine by me! I wasn't too sure if it was a decent idea or not. What about my first suggestion?
--Ed
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'd probably be wary about doing this again for the same blogpost, but it's probably an idea for the future?
Joe
On 29 June 2015 at 05:08, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
We could also try to make an explicit Game of Thrones reference, if it's not too repetitive: "Oberyn Martell and the Mountain from *Game of Thrones* could have fought in a trial by battle as late as 1818," or "*Game of Thrones*' Tyrion could have requested a trial by battle as late as 1818."
*Game of Thrones* there would be linked to the show's page (that should drive up views).
Sorry, if I actually watched GoT I would have thought of this before.
--Ed
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Hi Ed, sorry I'm lost, exactly which suggestion are you referring to?
By the way, I thought that trial by battle referred to Arbitration Committee proceedings. ;)
Pine On Jun 29, 2015 8:45 AM, "Ed Erhart" eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
Fine by me! I wasn't too sure if it was a decent idea or not. What about my first suggestion?
--Ed
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org
wrote:
I'd probably be wary about doing this again for the same blogpost, but it's probably an idea for the future?
Joe
On 29 June 2015 at 05:08, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
We could also try to make an explicit Game of Thrones reference, if it's not too repetitive: "Oberyn Martell and the Mountain from *Game of Thrones* could have fought in a trial by battle as late as 1818," or "*Game of Thrones*' Tyrion could have requested a trial by battle as late as 1818."
*Game of Thrones* there would be linked to the show's page (that should drive up views).
Sorry, if I actually watched GoT I would have thought of this before.
--Ed
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
I also proposed "Did you know ... that this US senator used his position to defend African American soldiers falsely accused of murder?" with the same stipulation as earlier—the second clause is neutral because all of the men were exonerated in the 1970s.
Re arbcom ... if they held *actual *trials by battle, I'd want GorillaWarfare and former arbitrator NuclearWarfare in my corner.
--Ed
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ed, sorry I'm lost, exactly which suggestion are you referring to?
By the way, I thought that trial by battle referred to Arbitration Committee proceedings. ;)
Pine On Jun 29, 2015 8:45 AM, "Ed Erhart" eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
Fine by me! I wasn't too sure if it was a decent idea or not. What about my first suggestion?
--Ed
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I'd probably be wary about doing this again for the same blogpost, but it's probably an idea for the future?
Joe
On 29 June 2015 at 05:08, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
We could also try to make an explicit Game of Thrones reference, if it's not too repetitive: "Oberyn Martell and the Mountain from *Game of Thrones* could have fought in a trial by battle as late as 1818," or "*Game of Thrones*' Tyrion could have requested a trial by battle as late as 1818."
*Game of Thrones* there would be linked to the show's page (that should drive up views).
Sorry, if I actually watched GoT I would have thought of this before.
--Ed
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
I like that one Ed!
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
I also proposed "Did you know ... that this US senator used his position to defend African American soldiers falsely accused of murder?" with the same stipulation as earlier—the second clause is neutral because all of the men were exonerated in the 1970s.
Re arbcom ... if they held *actual *trials by battle, I'd want GorillaWarfare and former arbitrator NuclearWarfare in my corner.
--Ed
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ed, sorry I'm lost, exactly which suggestion are you referring to?
By the way, I thought that trial by battle referred to Arbitration Committee proceedings. ;)
Pine On Jun 29, 2015 8:45 AM, "Ed Erhart" eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
Fine by me! I wasn't too sure if it was a decent idea or not. What about my first suggestion?
--Ed
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I'd probably be wary about doing this again for the same blogpost, but it's probably an idea for the future?
Joe
On 29 June 2015 at 05:08, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
We could also try to make an explicit Game of Thrones reference, if it's not too repetitive: "Oberyn Martell and the Mountain from *Game of Thrones* could have fought in a trial by battle as late as 1818," or "*Game of Thrones*' Tyrion could have requested a trial by battle as late as 1818."
*Game of Thrones* there would be linked to the show's page (that should drive up views).
Sorry, if I actually watched GoT I would have thought of this before.
--Ed
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
social-media@lists.wikimedia.org