Hey all,
We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
Many thanks to Nick for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
*Facebook/Google+:* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in three separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
thanks, Joe
(+Nick)
I know I wrote this one, but I'd change "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk" -> "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk."
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
Many thanks to Nick for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
*Facebook/Google+:* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in three separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Nice blog post.
Suggestion: "Unlike *Red October*, this ship was sunk"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
(+Nick)
I know I wrote this one, but I'd change "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk" -> "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk."
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
Many thanks to Nick for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
*Facebook/Google+:* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in three separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Alas, you can't italicise on social media.
Joe
On 5 August 2015 at 22:43, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Nice blog post.
Suggestion: "Unlike *Red October*, this ship was sunk"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
(+Nick)
I know I wrote this one, but I'd change "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk" -> "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk."
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
Many thanks to Nick for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
*Facebook/Google+:* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in three separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
OK. Even so, I think the best comparison for the ship is Red October rather than the Hunt for Red October.
Alternative:
"Wikipedia and the hunt for a Nazi battleship"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
Alas, you can't italicise on social media.
Joe
On 5 August 2015 at 22:43, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Nice blog post.
Suggestion: "Unlike *Red October*, this ship was sunk"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
(+Nick)
I know I wrote this one, but I'd change "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk" -> "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk."
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
Many thanks to Nick for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
*Facebook/Google+:* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in three separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
I kinda like using the hunt for Red October since it reflects the title of the blog post (The hunt for Tirpitz).
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
OK. Even so, I think the best comparison for the ship is Red October rather than the Hunt for Red October.
Alternative:
"Wikipedia and the hunt for a Nazi battleship"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
Alas, you can't italicise on social media.
Joe
On 5 August 2015 at 22:43, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Nice blog post.
Suggestion: "Unlike *Red October*, this ship was sunk"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
(+Nick)
I know I wrote this one, but I'd change "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk" -> "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk."
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
Many thanks to Nick for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
*Facebook/Google+:* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in three separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Perhaps "Unlike in The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk." ?
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:06 PM, James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote:
I kinda like using the hunt for Red October since it reflects the title of the blog post (The hunt for Tirpitz).
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
OK. Even so, I think the best comparison for the ship is Red October rather than the Hunt for Red October.
Alternative:
"Wikipedia and the hunt for a Nazi battleship"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Alas, you can't italicise on social media.
Joe
On 5 August 2015 at 22:43, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Nice blog post.
Suggestion: "Unlike *Red October*, this ship was sunk"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
(+Nick)
I know I wrote this one, but I'd change "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk" -> "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk."
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
Many thanks to Nick for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
*Facebook/Google+:* • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned their attention to its sister ship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in three separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a German battleship in Norway? https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/
thanks, Joe
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
@Pine, that was my originally suggested edit. ;-) Thank you for the comments!
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps "Unlike in The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk." ?
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:06 PM, James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote:
I kinda like using the hunt for Red October since it reflects the title of the blog post (The hunt for Tirpitz).
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
OK. Even so, I think the best comparison for the ship is Red October rather than the Hunt for Red October.
Alternative:
"Wikipedia and the hunt for a Nazi battleship"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Alas, you can't italicise on social media.
Joe
On 5 August 2015 at 22:43, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Nice blog post.
Suggestion: "Unlike *Red October*, this ship was sunk"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
(+Nick)
I know I wrote this one, but I'd change "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk" -> "Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk."
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Hey all, > > We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL: > > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ > > Many thanks to Nick for this post. > > Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as > needed. > > *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* > • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned > their attention to its sister ship. > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ > • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a > German battleship in Norway? > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ > > *Facebook/Google+:* > • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they turned > their attention to its sister ship. > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ > • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in three > separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ > • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a > German battleship in Norway? > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ > • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was sunk. > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ > > thanks, > Joe > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: > JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
I added one word. (: "in"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
@Pine, that was my originally suggested edit. ;-) Thank you for the comments!
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps "Unlike in The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk." ?
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:06 PM, James Alexander <jalexander@wikimedia.org
wrote:
I kinda like using the hunt for Red October since it reflects the title of the blog post (The hunt for Tirpitz).
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
OK. Even so, I think the best comparison for the ship is Red October rather than the Hunt for Red October.
Alternative:
"Wikipedia and the hunt for a Nazi battleship"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Alas, you can't italicise on social media.
Joe
On 5 August 2015 at 22:43, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Nice blog post.
Suggestion: "Unlike *Red October*, this ship was sunk"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
> (+Nick) > > I know I wrote this one, but I'd change "Unlike The Hunt for Red > October, this German battleship was sunk" -> "Unlike The Hunt for > Red October, this ship was sunk." > > --Ed > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Joe Sutherland < > jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL: >> >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >> >> Many thanks to Nick for this post. >> >> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as >> needed. >> >> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >> • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they >> turned their attention to its sister ship. >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >> • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a >> German battleship in Norway? >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >> >> *Facebook/Google+:* >> • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they >> turned their attention to its sister ship. >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >> • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in three >> separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >> • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on a >> German battleship in Norway? >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >> • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was >> sunk. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >> >> thanks, >> Joe >> >> -- >> *Joe Sutherland* >> Communications Intern [remote] >> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | >> w: JSutherland >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > > -- > Ed Erhart > Editorial Intern > Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
@Pine, ah, missed that. ;-) @Joe, can we make sure the image and caption are fixed when you share it on Facebook? When I share the page, it shows the graveyard image and includes the first image's caption, neither of which are very engaging. I like the image with the crewman next to the bomb—it's a human face.
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
I added one word. (: "in"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
@Pine, that was my originally suggested edit. ;-) Thank you for the comments!
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps "Unlike in The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk." ?
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:06 PM, James Alexander < jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I kinda like using the hunt for Red October since it reflects the title of the blog post (The hunt for Tirpitz).
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
OK. Even so, I think the best comparison for the ship is Red October rather than the Hunt for Red October.
Alternative:
"Wikipedia and the hunt for a Nazi battleship"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Alas, you can't italicise on social media.
Joe
On 5 August 2015 at 22:43, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
> Nice blog post. > > Suggestion: "Unlike *Red October*, this ship was sunk" > > Pine > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org > wrote: > >> (+Nick) >> >> I know I wrote this one, but I'd change "Unlike The Hunt for Red >> October, this German battleship was sunk" -> "Unlike The Hunt for >> Red October, this ship was sunk." >> >> --Ed >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Joe Sutherland < >> jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >>> Hey all, >>> >>> We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL: >>> >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>> >>> Many thanks to Nick for this post. >>> >>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as >>> needed. >>> >>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >>> • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they >>> turned their attention to its sister ship. >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>> • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on >>> a German battleship in Norway? >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>> >>> *Facebook/Google+:* >>> • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they >>> turned their attention to its sister ship. >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>> • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in three >>> separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>> • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on >>> a German battleship in Norway? >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>> • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was >>> sunk. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>> >>> thanks, >>> Joe >>> >>> -- >>> *Joe Sutherland* >>> Communications Intern [remote] >>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | >>> w: JSutherland >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Social-media mailing list >>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Ed Erhart >> Editorial Intern >> Wikimedia Foundation >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Sure. I'm going to aim to kick off social for this tomorrow AM.
Joe
On 5 August 2015 at 23:18, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
@Pine, ah, missed that. ;-) @Joe, can we make sure the image and caption are fixed when you share it on Facebook? When I share the page, it shows the graveyard image and includes the first image's caption, neither of which are very engaging. I like the image with the crewman next to the bomb—it's a human face.
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
I added one word. (: "in"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
@Pine, that was my originally suggested edit. ;-) Thank you for the comments!
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps "Unlike in The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk." ?
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:06 PM, James Alexander < jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I kinda like using the hunt for Red October since it reflects the title of the blog post (The hunt for Tirpitz).
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
OK. Even so, I think the best comparison for the ship is Red October rather than the Hunt for Red October.
Alternative:
"Wikipedia and the hunt for a Nazi battleship"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Alas, you can't italicise on social media. > > Joe > > On 5 August 2015 at 22:43, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote: > >> Nice blog post. >> >> Suggestion: "Unlike *Red October*, this ship was sunk" >> >> Pine >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org >> wrote: >> >>> (+Nick) >>> >>> I know I wrote this one, but I'd change "Unlike The Hunt for Red >>> October, this German battleship was sunk" -> "Unlike The Hunt for >>> Red October, this ship was sunk." >>> >>> --Ed >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Joe Sutherland < >>> jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>> We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL: >>>> >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> >>>> Many thanks to Nick for this post. >>>> >>>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as >>>> needed. >>>> >>>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >>>> • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they >>>> turned their attention to its sister ship. >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on >>>> a German battleship in Norway? >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> >>>> *Facebook/Google+:* >>>> • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they >>>> turned their attention to its sister ship. >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in three >>>> separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on >>>> a German battleship in Norway? >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was >>>> sunk. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Joe Sutherland* >>>> Communications Intern [remote] >>>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | >>>> w: JSutherland >>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Social-media mailing list >>>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ed Erhart >>> Editorial Intern >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Social-media mailing list >>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: > JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
We've shared this for the first time. I'll use the man and the bomb for round 2!
FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153435334088346
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/629301670514688000 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/629301670535630848
WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/Be2pECf... WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po...
On 5 August 2015 at 23:18, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
@Pine, ah, missed that. ;-) @Joe, can we make sure the image and caption are fixed when you share it on Facebook? When I share the page, it shows the graveyard image and includes the first image's caption, neither of which are very engaging. I like the image with the crewman next to the bomb—it's a human face.
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
I added one word. (: "in"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
@Pine, that was my originally suggested edit. ;-) Thank you for the comments!
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps "Unlike in The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk." ?
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:06 PM, James Alexander < jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I kinda like using the hunt for Red October since it reflects the title of the blog post (The hunt for Tirpitz).
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
OK. Even so, I think the best comparison for the ship is Red October rather than the Hunt for Red October.
Alternative:
"Wikipedia and the hunt for a Nazi battleship"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Sutherland < jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Alas, you can't italicise on social media. > > Joe > > On 5 August 2015 at 22:43, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote: > >> Nice blog post. >> >> Suggestion: "Unlike *Red October*, this ship was sunk" >> >> Pine >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org >> wrote: >> >>> (+Nick) >>> >>> I know I wrote this one, but I'd change "Unlike The Hunt for Red >>> October, this German battleship was sunk" -> "Unlike The Hunt for >>> Red October, this ship was sunk." >>> >>> --Ed >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Joe Sutherland < >>> jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>> We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL: >>>> >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> >>>> Many thanks to Nick for this post. >>>> >>>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as >>>> needed. >>>> >>>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >>>> • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they >>>> turned their attention to its sister ship. >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on >>>> a German battleship in Norway? >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> >>>> *Facebook/Google+:* >>>> • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they >>>> turned their attention to its sister ship. >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in three >>>> separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks on >>>> a German battleship in Norway? >>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was >>>> sunk. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Joe Sutherland* >>>> Communications Intern [remote] >>>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | >>>> w: JSutherland >>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Social-media mailing list >>>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ed Erhart >>> Editorial Intern >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Social-media mailing list >>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: > JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Round 2. Issue with Tweetdeck means the Twitter was delayed :(
FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153438491038346
@wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/629701185780477952 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/629701373223899136
WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/EFaJ45Z... WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po...
On 6 August 2015 at 15:44, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
We've shared this for the first time. I'll use the man and the bomb for round 2!
FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153435334088346
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/629301670514688000 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/629301670535630848
WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/Be2pECf... WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po...
On 5 August 2015 at 23:18, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
@Pine, ah, missed that. ;-) @Joe, can we make sure the image and caption are fixed when you share it on Facebook? When I share the page, it shows the graveyard image and includes the first image's caption, neither of which are very engaging. I like the image with the crewman next to the bomb—it's a human face.
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
I added one word. (: "in"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
@Pine, that was my originally suggested edit. ;-) Thank you for the comments!
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps "Unlike in The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk." ?
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:06 PM, James Alexander < jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I kinda like using the hunt for Red October since it reflects the title of the blog post (The hunt for Tirpitz).
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
> OK. Even so, I think the best comparison for the ship is Red October > rather than the Hunt for Red October. > > Alternative: > > "Wikipedia and the hunt for a Nazi battleship" > > Pine > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Sutherland < > jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: > >> Alas, you can't italicise on social media. >> >> Joe >> >> On 5 August 2015 at 22:43, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> Nice blog post. >>> >>> Suggestion: "Unlike *Red October*, this ship was sunk" >>> >>> Pine >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org >>> wrote: >>> >>>> (+Nick) >>>> >>>> I know I wrote this one, but I'd change "Unlike The Hunt for Red >>>> October, this German battleship was sunk" -> "Unlike The Hunt >>>> for Red October, this ship was sunk." >>>> >>>> --Ed >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Joe Sutherland < >>>> jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey all, >>>>> >>>>> We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL: >>>>> >>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>> >>>>> Many thanks to Nick for this post. >>>>> >>>>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as >>>>> needed. >>>>> >>>>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >>>>> • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they >>>>> turned their attention to its sister ship. >>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>> • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks >>>>> on a German battleship in Norway? >>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>> >>>>> *Facebook/Google+:* >>>>> • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they >>>>> turned their attention to its sister ship. >>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>> • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in >>>>> three separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. >>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>> • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks >>>>> on a German battleship in Norway? >>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>> • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was >>>>> sunk. >>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> Joe >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> *Joe Sutherland* >>>>> Communications Intern [remote] >>>>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu >>>>> | w: JSutherland >>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Social-media mailing list >>>>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ed Erhart >>>> Editorial Intern >>>> Wikimedia Foundation >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Social-media mailing list >>>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Social-media mailing list >>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Joe Sutherland* >> Communications Intern [remote] >> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | >> w: JSutherland >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Posted this a third time. That image's getting a second use.
FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153451711073346
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/631178472950484992 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/631178472954720257
WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/2XD4Azr... WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po...
On 7 August 2015 at 18:12, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
Round 2. Issue with Tweetdeck means the Twitter was delayed :(
FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153438491038346
@wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/629701185780477952 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/629701373223899136
WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/EFaJ45Z... WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po...
On 6 August 2015 at 15:44, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
We've shared this for the first time. I'll use the man and the bomb for round 2!
FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153435334088346
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/629301670514688000 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/629301670535630848
WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/Be2pECf... WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/po...
On 5 August 2015 at 23:18, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
@Pine, ah, missed that. ;-) @Joe, can we make sure the image and caption are fixed when you share it on Facebook? When I share the page, it shows the graveyard image and includes the first image's caption, neither of which are very engaging. I like the image with the crewman next to the bomb—it's a human face.
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
I added one word. (: "in"
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
@Pine, that was my originally suggested edit. ;-) Thank you for the comments!
--Ed
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps "Unlike in The Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk." ?
Pine
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:06 PM, James Alexander < jalexander@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> I kinda like using the hunt for Red October since it reflects the > title of the blog post (The hunt for Tirpitz). > > James Alexander > Community Advocacy > Wikimedia Foundation > (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote: > >> OK. Even so, I think the best comparison for the ship is Red >> October rather than the Hunt for Red October. >> >> Alternative: >> >> "Wikipedia and the hunt for a Nazi battleship" >> >> Pine >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Sutherland < >> jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >>> Alas, you can't italicise on social media. >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> On 5 August 2015 at 22:43, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>>> Nice blog post. >>>> >>>> Suggestion: "Unlike *Red October*, this ship was sunk" >>>> >>>> Pine >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> (+Nick) >>>>> >>>>> I know I wrote this one, but I'd change "Unlike The Hunt for >>>>> Red October, this German battleship was sunk" -> "Unlike The >>>>> Hunt for Red October, this ship was sunk." >>>>> >>>>> --Ed >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Joe Sutherland < >>>>> jsutherland@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>> >>>>>> We just published "The Hunt for Tirpitz" to the blog. URL: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Many thanks to Nick for this post. >>>>>> >>>>>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as >>>>>> needed. >>>>>> >>>>>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >>>>>> • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they >>>>>> turned their attention to its sister ship. >>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>>> • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks >>>>>> on a German battleship in Norway? >>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>>> >>>>>> *Facebook/Google+:* >>>>>> • After the British sunk the German battleship Bismarck, they >>>>>> turned their attention to its sister ship. >>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>>> • The British Royal Navy targeted this German battleship in >>>>>> three separate operations but could not sink the heavily armored warship. >>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>>> • Why did an Australian Wikipedian write about British attacks >>>>>> on a German battleship in Norway? >>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>>> • Unlike The Hunt for Red October, this German battleship was >>>>>> sunk. >>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/05/the-hunt-for-tirpitz/ >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks, >>>>>> Joe >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> *Joe Sutherland* >>>>>> Communications Intern [remote] >>>>>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu >>>>>> | w: JSutherland >>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Social-media mailing list >>>>>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ed Erhart >>>>> Editorial Intern >>>>> Wikimedia Foundation >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Social-media mailing list >>>>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Social-media mailing list >>>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Joe Sutherland* >>> Communications Intern [remote] >>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | >>> w: JSutherland >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF) >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Social-media mailing list >>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
-- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
social-media@lists.wikimedia.org