Glad we agree on the need to be discerning regarding tweets about single studies...
Having heard no objection against this last newsletter tweet, I have now retweeted it from @wikimedia, following our general four-eyes principle (that tweet had been crafted by Dario). These may on occasion also be suitable for @wikipedia, but that would need to be looked at on a case-by-case basis.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Michael Guss mguss@wikimedia.org wrote:
No we would need to curate to determine which studies are suitable for social promotion.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Tilman Bayer tbayer@wikimedia.org wrote:
It seems we are developing more of an interest in these recently... I don't think every new study is suitable to be promoted or endorsed via @wikipedia and other main accounts, but I'd selfishly suggest to retweet https://twitter.com/WikiResearch on suitable occasions. In particular, if there are no objections, I will start retweeting the new issues of the monthly newsletter more regularly from @wikimedia (and from @wikipedia too when fitting), starting with the new one: https://twitter.com/WikiResearch/status/594719120471433216 (we did this a couple of times before, as it's done for most other blog posts) -- Tilman Bayer Senior Analyst Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Michael Guss Research Analyst Wikimediafoundation.org mguss@wikimedia.org
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media