agreed with Joe, I’d rather focus on the data release angle.
On Sep 25, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
Looks good, though I'm not sure where the "help us understand" bit comes in. Is that just to qualify that we don't have a cause?
On 25 September 2015 at 18:48, Ed Erhart <eerhart@wikimedia.org mailto:eerhart@wikimedia.org> wrote: Hi all,
We just published "Wikipedia’s very active editor numbers have stabilized—delve into the data with us" to the blog. Thanks to Aaron, Neil, and Dario for their help with the post!
Proposed social media messages:
Facebook/Google+/Twitter: The English Wikipedia's number of very active editors appears to have stabilized. Help us understand why. -- Ed Erhart Editorial Associate Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org mailto:Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Joe Sutherland Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu http://twitter.com/jrbsu | w: JSutherland https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)
Dario Taraborelli Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation wikimediafoundation.org http://wikimediafoundation.org/ • nitens.org http://nitens.org/ • @readermeter http://twitter.com/readermeter