Oh damn, missed this this morning. Tomorrow or Monday?
On 9 August 2015 at 00:15, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
A quick ping on this to make sure the social gets out. :-)
--Ed
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
That was about the gallery example, yes—no worries. :-)
--Ed
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Tilman Bayer tbayer@wikimedia.org wrote:
That could be mitigated by cropping. (I assume you are talking about the illustration for the tweet - apologies if that was about the gallery examples in WordPress instead.)
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
I reworded it, but to me, those images are a bit on the small side.
--Ed
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Tilman Bayer tbayer@wikimedia.org
wrote:
(BTW, as I'm re-reading that disclaimer, an offtopic remark about the blog post itself: I think this one works OK with just two images, but regarding "far more images than this platform can comfortably accommodate", it's worth being aware that WordPress has a gallery feature that can reproduce a layout such as in the Signpost original fairly well. See e.g.
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/11/04/wikimedia-russia-tunguska-electronic-m...
or
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/09/05/celebrating-the-10th-anniversary-of-wi...
IIRC it is also documented in the blog admin documentation; if not, I can add a bit later.)
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
I think the disclaimer covers any doubts on that front anyway. I'll
look
to get this out tomorrow then, I think, for maximum reach.
Joe
On 7 August 2015 at 23:06, Tilman Bayer tbayer@wikimedia.org
wrote:
> > (readding Gamaliel) > > Yes, it goes a bit on the offensive, but I think that is fine in
this
> case. > > The blog post contains two PD images which can be uploaded to
> without licensing concerns. I would suggest to shorten the tweet as > follows so as to make room for one of them (in addition to the blog > link), which as we know can help a lot to increase engagement: > > The Basic Art series from @TASCHENBooks is missing 100 famous
women.
> Wikipedia has them all. [IMAGE] > > >
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/07/systemic-bias-wikipedia-vs-publishers/
> > I would tend towards choosing the painting, but both should work. > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM, James Alexander > jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote: > > Yeah, especially since we're posting from @Wikipedia I don't
think
> > it's > > needed either. > > > > It is a bit passive aggressive but it gets the point of the
article
> > across > > and I'm not sure it's possible to do that without being a bit
either
> > passive > > or actively aggressive ;) > > > > James Alexander > > Community Advocacy > > Wikimedia Foundation > > (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Joe Sutherland > > jsutherland@wikimedia.org > > wrote: > >> > >> LGTM. I don't think it's a good idea to hashtag Wikipedia based
on
> >> Michael's advice on searches for that term though. > >> > >> best, > >> Joe > >> > >> On 7 August 2015 at 22:51, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org
wrote:
> >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> We just published "Wikipedia better equipped to deal with
systemic
> >>> bias > >>> than traditional publishers" to the Wikimedia blog. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/07/systemic-bias-wikipedia-vs-publishers
> >>> > >>> Comments on the tone would be appreciated—I veered a little bit > >>> into > >>> passive-aggressive territory. > >>> > >>> Twitter: > >>> > >>> The Basic Art series from @TASCHENBooks is missing 100 famous > >>> women, > >>> but > >>> #Wikipedia has them all. > >>> > >>> Facebook/G+: > >>> > >>> The Basic Art series from Taschen Books is missing 100 famous > >>> women, > >>> but > >>> #Wikipedia has them all. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Ed Erhart > >>> Editorial Intern > >>> Wikimedia Foundation > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Social-media mailing list > >>> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Joe Sutherland > >> Communications Intern [remote] > >> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Social-media mailing list > >> Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Social-media mailing list > > Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > > > > > > -- > Tilman Bayer > Senior Analyst > Wikimedia Foundation > IRC (Freenode): HaeB > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Joe Sutherland Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Tilman Bayer Senior Analyst Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
--
Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Tilman Bayer Senior Analyst Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
--
Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
--
Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media