https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/651108809121923072
Looks like no one objected.
I think that there's a difference between Wikimedia tweeting about Jobs and Wikipedia. I genuinely appreciate the discussion and grounding in our values - they're important! they attenuate if we don't affirm them - but I don't see a problem here. Our mission is all knowledge, and we want to reach every human. Some of those humans will be from the cult of Mac. That's okay.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Ivan Martínez galaver@gmail.com wrote:
I think we are not a "stallmanian" movement but many of our people it is. I'm just pointing that some criticize can raise.
(E-mail writed from a MacBook)
2015-10-07 15:30 GMT-05:00 James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Tilman Bayer tbayer@wikimedia.org wrote:
What's worth discussion thouhg is the general assumption (which my initial post was a response to) that simply because we link to Wikipedia and highlight a fact from it, we are automatically in the clear. As demonstrated abundantly in the past in the case of certain Mediterranean topics, the general public and large parts of our community don't agree ;)
Agree, it's more complicated then that :)
James Alexander Manager Trust & Safety Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- *Iván Martínez*
*Presidente - Wikimedia México A.C.User:ProtoplasmaKid @protoplasmakid*
Hemos creado la más grande colección de conocimiento compartido. Ayuda a proteger a Wikipedia, dona ahora: https://donate.wikimedia.org
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media