I reworded it, but to me, those images are a bit on the small side.
--Ed
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Tilman Bayer tbayer@wikimedia.org wrote:
(BTW, as I'm re-reading that disclaimer, an offtopic remark about the blog post itself: I think this one works OK with just two images, but regarding "far more images than this platform can comfortably accommodate", it's worth being aware that WordPress has a gallery feature that can reproduce a layout such as in the Signpost original fairly well. See e.g.
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/11/04/wikimedia-russia-tunguska-electronic-m... or https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/09/05/celebrating-the-10th-anniversary-of-wi... IIRC it is also documented in the blog admin documentation; if not, I can add a bit later.)
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
I think the disclaimer covers any doubts on that front anyway. I'll look
to
get this out tomorrow then, I think, for maximum reach.
Joe
On 7 August 2015 at 23:06, Tilman Bayer tbayer@wikimedia.org wrote:
(readding Gamaliel)
Yes, it goes a bit on the offensive, but I think that is fine in this case.
The blog post contains two PD images which can be uploaded to Twitter without licensing concerns. I would suggest to shorten the tweet as follows so as to make room for one of them (in addition to the blog link), which as we know can help a lot to increase engagement:
The Basic Art series from @TASCHENBooks is missing 100 famous women. Wikipedia has them all. [IMAGE]
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/07/systemic-bias-wikipedia-vs-publishers/
I would tend towards choosing the painting, but both should work.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM, James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yeah, especially since we're posting from @Wikipedia I don't think
it's
needed either.
It is a bit passive aggressive but it gets the point of the article across and I'm not sure it's possible to do that without being a bit either passive or actively aggressive ;)
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Joe Sutherland jsutherland@wikimedia.org wrote:
LGTM. I don't think it's a good idea to hashtag Wikipedia based on Michael's advice on searches for that term though.
best, Joe
On 7 August 2015 at 22:51, Ed Erhart eerhart@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi all,
We just published "Wikipedia better equipped to deal with systemic bias than traditional publishers" to the Wikimedia blog.
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/07/systemic-bias-wikipedia-vs-publishers
Comments on the tone would be appreciated—I veered a little bit into passive-aggressive territory.
Twitter:
The Basic Art series from @TASCHENBooks is missing 100 famous women, but #Wikipedia has them all.
Facebook/G+:
The Basic Art series from Taschen Books is missing 100 famous women, but #Wikipedia has them all.
-- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Joe Sutherland Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Tilman Bayer Senior Analyst Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Joe Sutherland Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
-- Tilman Bayer Senior Analyst Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media