Just FYI. I'm not going to routinely forward wiki-research-l posts here, assuming all of you are on that list or will be soon ( http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l ). Sharing data like this early is generally something we want to get into the habit of doing. :-)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Howie Fung hfung@wikimedia.org Date: 2010/9/29 Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Article Feedback Feature: Public Policy Pilot To: wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Everyone,
As some of you may know, we launched an experimental Article Feedback feature as part of the Public Policy Initiative last week. The "Article Feedback Tool" enables readers to quickly assessthe sourcing, completeness, neutrality, and readability of a Wikipedia article on a five-point scale. It is currently deployed on about 300 articles [1] in the area of Public Policy on the English Wikipedia. More details may be found on the blog post [2] as well as the post on Foundation-l [3].
We've been capturing the ratings data and have some early analysis to share around the types of ratings users are providing. There are some interesting differences between anonymous and registered users:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Article_feedback/Public_Policy_Pilot/Early_Dat...
The dump of the article-level data is also available [4] for those who are interested.
If anyone would like to be involved in the ongoing research and evaluation of this tool, please sign up on the Article Feedback Workgroup page. [5]
Howie
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Article_Feedback_Pilot [2] http://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2010/09/22/article-feedback-pilot-goes-live/ [3] http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-September/061056.html [4] https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Aikdcg5HdSKbdFRhdUN1Rm1iZzB5dUdMUlY... [5] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Article_feedback/Public_Policy_Pilot/Workgroup
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
An editorial appeared yesterday in PLoS Computational Biology trying to reach out to the academic community and persuade it to contribute to Wikipedia.
Logan DW, Sandal M, Gardner PP, Manske M, Bateman A (2010) Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia. PLoS Comput Biol 6(9): e1000941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000941
-- Dario Taraborelli
Research Fellow Centre for Research in Social Simulation University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH United Kingdom http://cress.soc.surrey.ac.uk http://nitens.org/taraborelli
Editor, Review of Philosophy and Psychology http://www.springer.com/13164