Any chances we are getting a link to the study? I find it completely out of line to discuss a study - or anything in relation to it - without ever being able to see the study itself.
Best,
Goran
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Dario Taraborelli < dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
ok just to clarify, I will be meeting this Thursday with a number of people (including non RCom members) to work on the actual changes for the Berkman banner, I don't expect RCom members to be involved unless they wish so.
The purpose of the RCom meeting next week is not to review these changes but to do a post-mortem of the Berkman incident and discuss best practices for subject recruitment requests in general.
Dario
On Dec 13, 2011, at 9:24 AM, c.note.lilly wrote:
Dario,
Is this just for those interested in the discussion about the study? Not the entire RCom? or you still would like to have all of RCom, just not call this an official RCom mtg since there will be outsiders (those against the survey?)
Cheryl *sorry, crazy end of the semester, working on catching up.
On 12/12/11 4:10 PM, Dario Taraborelli wrote:
Here's a link for a doodle poll, please let me know your availability as soon as possible so we can finalize a date for next week. I am planning to close this poll by *Saturday 9am PST*.
http://www.doodle.com/vb5w8ntrftmyp4w3
Thanks Dario
On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Fuster, Mayo wrote:
I find very useful Dario's distinction and agree with the procedural he suggests, Mayo
«·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·» «·´¨*·¸¸« Mayo Fuster Morell ».¸.·*¨`·» «·´`·.(¸.·´(¸.·* *·.¸)`·.¸).·´`·»
Research Digital Commons Governance: http://www.onlinecreation.info
Fellow Berkman center for Internet and Society. Harvard University. Postdoctoral Researcher. Institute of Govern and Public Policies. Autonomous University of Barcelona. Visiting scholar. Internet Interdisciplinary Institute. Open University of Catalonia (UOC). Member Research Committee. Wikimedia Foundation Ph.D European University Institute Visiting researcher (2008). School of information. University of California, Berkeley.
E-mail: mayo.fuster@eui.eu E-mail: mayofm@cyber.law.harvard.edu Twitter/Identica: Lilaroja Skype: mayoneti Phone United States: 001 - 8576548231 Phone Spanish State: 0034-648877748
Berkman Center 23 Everett Street, 2nd Floor Cambridge, MA 02138 +1 (617) 495-7547 (Phone) +1 (617) 495-7641 (Fax)
Personal Postal Address USA: The Acetarium http://www.acetarium.com/ 265 Elm Street - 4 Somerville, MA, USA 02144 ________________________________________ From: rcom-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [ rcom-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Dario Taraborelli [ dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org] Sent: 12 December 2011 21:08 To: The Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee mailing list Subject: Re: [RCom-l] The tragedy of the Commons
My feeling is that we shouldn't be conflating the two issues, as this would be confusing for the community:
- review of Berkman banner and implementation of changes discussed on the
list http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2011-December/070765.html
- discussion of future approach towards SR, Omnibus survey etc
(1) needs to take place this week, I have a conference call (date/time still tbc) with the researchers and some community members, if any of you is willing to help with this please let me know off-list and I'll add you to the list of attendees. I don't feel there's a need to host an actual RCom meeting to review the proposed changes (which seem fairly uncontroversial and will be discussed on wiki). I would rather keep this opportunity to discuss (2) and the broader implications of the Berkman incident for the future.
Dario
On Dec 12, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:50:24 -0500, Diederik van Liere
dvanliere@gmail.com dvanliere@gmail.com wrote:
Dear WSC,
I think we need to be very precise about what the Berkman controversy is
about. My understanding is that the use of banners with logo's on
central
notice during the fundraiser and the kickback of donations is at the
heart
of the controversy. It is not about the legitimacy of the research
institutes, nor is it about surveys as a research methodology, or the
actual research questions. As such, I think that we need to discus how
to
to promote research studies but not debate the merits of Wikipedia
research
itself.
I think right now it is mostly about the lack of communication, and this
is what we need to discuss as well. The main objections have been
summarized at two pages on English Wikipedia,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Inciden...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Central_Notices
as well as on the Meta proposal page
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Dynamics_of_Online_Interactions_and_...
Cheers
Yaroslav
RCom-l mailing list
RCom-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l
RCom-l mailing list RCom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
RCom-l mailing list RCom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l
RCom-l mailing listRCom-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l
RCom-l mailing list RCom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l
RCom-l mailing list RCom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l