I hadn't seen this thread before but have reacted on the matter: http://wir.okfn.org/2011/11/18/why-are-pornstars-more-notable-than-scientist... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestio... Daniel
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Parul Vora pvora@wikimedia.org wrote:
ditto. On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Dario Taraborelli dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org wrote:
stories like this one infuriate me *as a Wikipedian*, before I even start thinking of RCOM
On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:20 PM, Diederik van Liere wrote:
Ouch! I think the author raises some real good points but I think this needs to be picked up by the larger community and not RCOM perse. Diederik
On 2011-11-18, at 12:14 AM, Dario Taraborelli wrote:
speaking of expert engagement
http://www.chemconnector.com/2011/11/17/why-are-pornstars-more-notable-than-... _______________________________________________ RCom-l mailing list RCom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l
RCom-l mailing list RCom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l
RCom-l mailing list RCom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l
RCom-l mailing list RCom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l