i.e. it's ok to let John know that this is a community consultation that is not of RCom competence
On Sep 6, 2011, at 5:15 PM, Dario Taraborelli wrote:
I agree with Yaroslav, this doesn't sound like an area of interest for RCom – we were not solicited to participate as a committee, only as individual community members. I don't think we need to signal that we were not consulted unless any of you considers that we should have been.
My 2 cents,
Dario
On Sep 6, 2011, at 1:27 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:39:54 +0100, WereSpielChequers werespielchequers@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Many of you will be aware that there has been a bit of flak about the referendum/plebiscite/consultation about the image filter.
John Vandenburg posted this
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2011-September/067889.html...
the Foundation mailing list.
Unless anyone has a better response to make, I'll post that RCOM collectively was not consulted, though I don't know if any individual
RCOM
members were consulted about those questions.
Cheers
WereSpielChequers
I agree, and I thinbk it is important to do it quickly, nobody would get interested in a week. May be just to wait till RCom member in California have a chance to read this message later in the (European) afternoon.
Another question to discuss would be whether we should have been consulted. I am not sure. This is not really research, this was supposed to be a vote.
Cheers Yaroslav
RCom-l mailing list RCom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l