Pywikipediabot now has code review in the same way as MediaWiki[1]. Tim has implemented this a few hours ago. Thanks Tim!
Below you can find a description of the new functionality. I hope we can discuss whatever you may see differently or whatever I may have left out.
Please mind the following if you wish to participate in the code review: * anyone can use the tool in a read-only mode (right: codereview-use) * registered users can submit comments on revisions (right: codereview-post-comment) * coders can link committers to mediawiki.org user accounts. All committers should have an account on mediawiki.org with a confirmed e-mail address and linked their user to their committer identity[2]. This allows you to get e-mails on your revs and follow-up revs. (right: codereview-link-user, role: coder) * coders can add and remove tags for revisions in the review module. For MediaWiki this feature isn't used that much, but it can be used to group revisions (rights: codereview-add-tag, codereview-remove-tag, role: coder) * coders can change the status of revisions (right: codereview-set-status, role coder). Possible states are: ** new: default state ** fixme: something needs to be done for this revision is broken - the original committer should feel responsible for doing this ** reverted: this revision has been reverted ** resolved: this revision was marked fixme, but the issue has been resolved in a later revision ** ok: this revision has been reviewed by a coder able to assess the revision and no issues have been found ** verified: uncertain, as not used in MediaWiki code review. I propose not to use this tag until we need it for whatever * coders can add new coders[3] (role: coder). This is supposed to be a web of trust. Only change state to ok for revisions that you really understand, and keep comments to the point. If you have the coder role, you can do code review also on MediaWiki; please only stick to the project you develop on with regards to code review functionality.
If you make follow-up revisions, please mention to which revision (with r#####) you are following up to in your commit summary. This will automatically link the new revision in the code review page of the followed-up revision.
[1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia [2] link "(link?)" on http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/author/committername [3] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:UserRights/username [4] list of coders: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:ListUsers/coder
Cheers!
Siebrand
The last reported bug has been fixed and all works fine.
There is the point svn should lead to the right code review for pwb instead to MediaWiki. See https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23177
xqt
----- Original Nachricht ---- Von: Siebrand Mazeland s.mazeland@xs4all.nl An: 'Pywikipedia discussion list' pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Datum: 02.06.2010 09:22 Betreff: [Pywikipedia-l] Can has pywikipediabot code review? Yes!
Pywikipediabot now has code review in the same way as MediaWiki[1]. Tim has implemented this a few hours ago. Thanks Tim!
Below you can find a description of the new functionality. I hope we can discuss whatever you may see differently or whatever I may have left out.
Please mind the following if you wish to participate in the code review:
- anyone can use the tool in a read-only mode (right: codereview-use)
- registered users can submit comments on revisions (right:
codereview-post-comment)
- coders can link committers to mediawiki.org user accounts. All committers
should have an account on mediawiki.org with a confirmed e-mail address and linked their user to their committer identity[2]. This allows you to get e-mails on your revs and follow-up revs. (right: codereview-link-user, role: coder)
- coders can add and remove tags for revisions in the review module. For
MediaWiki this feature isn't used that much, but it can be used to group revisions (rights: codereview-add-tag, codereview-remove-tag, role: coder)
- coders can change the status of revisions (right: codereview-set-status,
role coder). Possible states are: ** new: default state ** fixme: something needs to be done for this revision is broken - the original committer should feel responsible for doing this ** reverted: this revision has been reverted ** resolved: this revision was marked fixme, but the issue has been resolved in a later revision ** ok: this revision has been reviewed by a coder able to assess the revision and no issues have been found ** verified: uncertain, as not used in MediaWiki code review. I propose not to use this tag until we need it for whatever
- coders can add new coders[3] (role: coder). This is supposed to be a web
of trust. Only change state to ok for revisions that you really understand, and keep comments to the point. If you have the coder role, you can do code review also on MediaWiki; please only stick to the project you develop on with regards to code review functionality.
If you make follow-up revisions, please mention to which revision (with r#####) you are following up to in your commit summary. This will automatically link the new revision in the code review page of the followed-up revision.
[1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia [2] link "(link?)" on http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/author/committername
[3] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:UserRights/username [4] list of coders: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:ListUsers/coder
Cheers!
Siebrand
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Und was machen Sie heute abend? Alles Events Ihrer Gegend auf einen Blick im Arcor.de-Veranstaltungskalender: http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.events
----- Original Nachricht ---- Von: Siebrand Mazeland s.mazeland@xs4all.nl An: 'Pywikipedia discussion list' pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Datum: 02.06.2010 09:22 Betreff: [Pywikipedia-l] Can has pywikipediabot code review? Yes!
- registered users can submit comments on revisions (right:
codereview-post-comment)
I am wondering: this is no longer availlable on most reviews.
Regards xqt
Please forget it! I wasn't logged in. Sorry for disturbing you.
Greetings xqt
----- Original Nachricht ---- Von: info@gno.de An: pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Datum: 09.06.2010 17:41 Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] Can has pywikipediabot code review? Yes!
----- Original Nachricht ---- Von: Siebrand Mazeland s.mazeland@xs4all.nl An: 'Pywikipedia discussion list' pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Datum: 02.06.2010 09:22 Betreff: [Pywikipedia-l] Can has pywikipediabot code review? Yes!
- registered users can submit comments on revisions (right:
codereview-post-comment)
I am wondering: this is no longer availlable on most reviews.
Regards xqt
-- WM 2010: Top News, Spielpläne, Public Viewing-Termine, E-Cards und alles, was der Fan sonst noch braucht, gibt´s im Sport-Channel auf arcor.de. http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.wm2010
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org