Hi everyone,
As you might know phase 1 of Wikidata (interwiki links) is live at a lot of Wikipedia's and soon to be turned on for all Wikipedia's. Phase 2 is next, that's basically about infobox data. We are going to need a lot of clever bots to fill Wikidata. To make that possible Pywikipedia should (properly) implement Wikidata. That way bot authors don't have to worry or care about the inner workings of the Wikidata api, they just talk to the framework. At the moment trunk has a first implementation that isn't very clean and in the rewrite it's still missing.
Legoktm and I talked about this on irc. We need to have a proper data model in Pywikipedia. Based on https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/Data_model_primer : * WikibasePage is a subclass of Page and has some basic shared functions for labels, descriptions and aliases * ItemPage is a subclass of WikibasePage with some item specific functions like claims and sitelinks (example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q256638) * PropertyPage is a subclass of WikibasePage with some property specific functions for the datatype (example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P22) * QueryPage is a subclass of WikibasePage for the future query type * Claim is a subclass of object for claims. Simplified: It's a property (P22, father) attached to an item (Q256638, the princes) linking to another item (Q380949, Willem IV)
You can get these pages like a normal page (site object + title), but you probably also want to get them based on a Wikipedia page. For that there is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:ItemByTitle/enwiki/Princess%20Carolina... . We should have a staticmethod itemByPage(Page) in which Page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Carolina_of_Orange-Nassau and it will give you the itemPage object for https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q256638. Currently in trunk the DataPage object has a constructor where you can give a page object and you'll get the corrosponding dataPage. I don't think that's the way to do it because it violates the data model and will get us in a lot of trouble later on when other sites (like Commons) might implement the Wikibase extension.
A WikibasePage should work the same as a normal page when it comes to fetching data. It should have the initial version (just a title, no content) and once you use a function that needs data (or you force it), it will fetch all the data from Wikibase and caches it. * For an item the data looks like https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&ids=Q256638&... * For a property the data looks like https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&ids=P22&form... Parts of the data (description, aliases and labels) should be processed in the get function of WikibasePage, other parts in ItemPage /PropertyPage
Based on the api we should probably have some generators: * One or more generator that uses wbgetentities to (pre-)fetch objects * A search generator that uses wbsearchentities
WikibasePage: * Set/add/delete label (@property?) * Set/add/delete description (@property?) * Set/add/delete alias (@property?)
ItemPage * Set/add/delete sitelink (@property?)
Claim logic
Not sure how we can use wbeditentity and wblinktitles
We took some notes on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Pywikipediabot/Wikidata/Rewrite_propos... .
What do you think? Is this the right direction? Feedback is appreciated.
Maarten
I would also like to bring up the pending Wikidata API RFC at http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Wikidata_API
In that RFC I plan to unify Wikidata API to be more seamlessly integrated with the core query API. Any feedback from pywiki community is welcome.
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Maarten Dammers maarten@mdammers.nlwrote:
Hi everyone,
As you might know phase 1 of Wikidata (interwiki links) is live at a lot of Wikipedia's and soon to be turned on for all Wikipedia's. Phase 2 is next, that's basically about infobox data. We are going to need a lot of clever bots to fill Wikidata. To make that possible Pywikipedia should (properly) implement Wikidata. That way bot authors don't have to worry or care about the inner workings of the Wikidata api, they just talk to the framework. At the moment trunk has a first implementation that isn't very clean and in the rewrite it's still missing.
Legoktm and I talked about this on irc. We need to have a proper data model in Pywikipedia. Based on https://meta.wikimedia.org/** wiki/Wikidata/Notes/Data_**model_primerhttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/Data_model_primer:
- WikibasePage is a subclass of Page and has some basic shared functions
for labels, descriptions and aliases
- ItemPage is a subclass of WikibasePage with some item specific functions
like claims and sitelinks (example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/**Q256638https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q256638 )
- PropertyPage is a subclass of WikibasePage with some property specific
functions for the datatype (example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/** Property:P22 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P22)
- QueryPage is a subclass of WikibasePage for the future query type
- Claim is a subclass of object for claims. Simplified: It's a property
(P22, father) attached to an item (Q256638, the princes) linking to another item (Q380949, Willem IV)
You can get these pages like a normal page (site object + title), but you probably also want to get them based on a Wikipedia page. For that there is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/**Special:ItemByTitle/enwiki/** Princess%20Carolina%20of%**20Orange-Nassauhttps://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:ItemByTitle/enwiki/Princess%20Carolina%20of%20Orange-Nassau. We should have a staticmethod itemByPage(Page) in which Page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Princess_Carolina_of_Orange-**Nassauhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Carolina_of_Orange-Nassauand it will give you the itemPage object for https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/**Q256638https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q256638. Currently in trunk the DataPage object has a constructor where you can give a page object and you'll get the corrosponding dataPage. I don't think that's the way to do it because it violates the data model and will get us in a lot of trouble later on when other sites (like Commons) might implement the Wikibase extension.
A WikibasePage should work the same as a normal page when it comes to fetching data. It should have the initial version (just a title, no content) and once you use a function that needs data (or you force it), it will fetch all the data from Wikibase and caches it.
- For an item the data looks like https://www.wikidata.org/w/**
api.php?action=wbgetentities&**ids=Q256638&format=jsonhttps://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&ids=Q256638&format=json
- For a property the data looks like https://www.wikidata.org/w/**
api.php?action=wbgetentities&**ids=P22&format=jsonhttps://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&ids=P22&format=json Parts of the data (description, aliases and labels) should be processed in the get function of WikibasePage, other parts in ItemPage /PropertyPage
Based on the api we should probably have some generators:
- One or more generator that uses wbgetentities to (pre-)fetch objects
- A search generator that uses wbsearchentities
WikibasePage:
- Set/add/delete label (@property?)
- Set/add/delete description (@property?)
- Set/add/delete alias (@property?)
ItemPage
- Set/add/delete sitelink (@property?)
Claim logic
Not sure how we can use wbeditentity and wblinktitles
We took some notes on https://www.mediawiki.org/** wiki/Manual:Pywikipediabot/**Wikidata/Rewrite_proposalhttps://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Pywikipediabot/Wikidata/Rewrite_proposal.
What do you think? Is this the right direction? Feedback is appreciated.
Maarten
______________________________**_________________ Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.**org Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Hi Yurik,
Op 2-3-2013 17:00, Yuri Astrakhan schreef:
I would also like to bring up the pending Wikidata API RFC at http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Wikidata_API
Thanks for pointing that out.
In that RFC I plan to unify Wikidata API to be more seamlessly integrated with the core query API. Any feedback from pywiki community is welcome.
If we can still functionally do the same what I described below you probably won't get any complaints from this side. Is that the case? Can you please include a period of overlap of old-style and new-style api so we have time to update the framework?
Maarten
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Maarten Dammers <maarten@mdammers.nl mailto:maarten@mdammers.nl> wrote:
Hi everyone, As you might know phase 1 of Wikidata (interwiki links) is live at a lot of Wikipedia's and soon to be turned on for all Wikipedia's. Phase 2 is next, that's basically about infobox data. We are going to need a lot of clever bots to fill Wikidata. To make that possible Pywikipedia should (properly) implement Wikidata. That way bot authors don't have to worry or care about the inner workings of the Wikidata api, they just talk to the framework. At the moment trunk has a first implementation that isn't very clean and in the rewrite it's still missing. Legoktm and I talked about this on irc. We need to have a proper data model in Pywikipedia. Based on https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/Data_model_primer : * WikibasePage is a subclass of Page and has some basic shared functions for labels, descriptions and aliases * ItemPage is a subclass of WikibasePage with some item specific functions like claims and sitelinks (example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q256638) * PropertyPage is a subclass of WikibasePage with some property specific functions for the datatype (example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P22) * QueryPage is a subclass of WikibasePage for the future query type * Claim is a subclass of object for claims. Simplified: It's a property (P22, father) attached to an item (Q256638, the princes) linking to another item (Q380949, Willem IV) You can get these pages like a normal page (site object + title), but you probably also want to get them based on a Wikipedia page. For that there is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:ItemByTitle/enwiki/Princess%20Carolina%20of%20Orange-Nassau . We should have a staticmethod itemByPage(Page) in which Page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Carolina_of_Orange-Nassau and it will give you the itemPage object for https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q256638. Currently in trunk the DataPage object has a constructor where you can give a page object and you'll get the corrosponding dataPage. I don't think that's the way to do it because it violates the data model and will get us in a lot of trouble later on when other sites (like Commons) might implement the Wikibase extension. A WikibasePage should work the same as a normal page when it comes to fetching data. It should have the initial version (just a title, no content) and once you use a function that needs data (or you force it), it will fetch all the data from Wikibase and caches it. * For an item the data looks like https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&ids=Q256638&format=json * For a property the data looks like https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&ids=P22&format=json Parts of the data (description, aliases and labels) should be processed in the get function of WikibasePage, other parts in ItemPage /PropertyPage Based on the api we should probably have some generators: * One or more generator that uses wbgetentities to (pre-)fetch objects * A search generator that uses wbsearchentities WikibasePage: * Set/add/delete label (@property?) * Set/add/delete description (@property?) * Set/add/delete alias (@property?) ItemPage * Set/add/delete sitelink (@property?) Claim logic Not sure how we can use wbeditentity and wblinktitles We took some notes on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Pywikipediabot/Wikidata/Rewrite_proposal . What do you think? Is this the right direction? Feedback is appreciated. Maarten _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Of course, the goal is to keep (and even enhance) the current functionality. And yes, there will be a significant overlap when both api's would function. The main reason for posting it now is so that whoever decides to implement it would know the wikidata api roadmap and plan accordingly. Plus I hope for a ton of good suggestions :)
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Maarten Dammers maarten@mdammers.nlwrote:
Hi Yurik,
Op 2-3-2013 17:00, Yuri Astrakhan schreef:
I would also like to bring up the pending Wikidata API RFC at http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Wikidata_API
Thanks for pointing that out.
In that RFC I plan to unify Wikidata API to be more seamlessly integrated with the core query API. Any feedback from pywiki community is welcome.
If we can still functionally do the same what I described below you probably won't get any complaints from this side. Is that the case? Can you please include a period of overlap of old-style and new-style api so we have time to update the framework?
Maarten
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Maarten Dammers maarten@mdammers.nlwrote:
Hi everyone,
As you might know phase 1 of Wikidata (interwiki links) is live at a lot of Wikipedia's and soon to be turned on for all Wikipedia's. Phase 2 is next, that's basically about infobox data. We are going to need a lot of clever bots to fill Wikidata. To make that possible Pywikipedia should (properly) implement Wikidata. That way bot authors don't have to worry or care about the inner workings of the Wikidata api, they just talk to the framework. At the moment trunk has a first implementation that isn't very clean and in the rewrite it's still missing.
Legoktm and I talked about this on irc. We need to have a proper data model in Pywikipedia. Based on https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/Data_model_primer :
- WikibasePage is a subclass of Page and has some basic shared functions
for labels, descriptions and aliases
- ItemPage is a subclass of WikibasePage with some item specific
functions like claims and sitelinks (example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q256638)
- PropertyPage is a subclass of WikibasePage with some property specific
functions for the datatype (example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P22)
- QueryPage is a subclass of WikibasePage for the future query type
- Claim is a subclass of object for claims. Simplified: It's a property
(P22, father) attached to an item (Q256638, the princes) linking to another item (Q380949, Willem IV)
You can get these pages like a normal page (site object + title), but you probably also want to get them based on a Wikipedia page. For that there is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:ItemByTitle/enwiki/Princess%20Carolina.... We should have a staticmethod itemByPage(Page) in which Page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Carolina_of_Orange-Nassau and it will give you the itemPage object for https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q256638. Currently in trunk the DataPage object has a constructor where you can give a page object and you'll get the corrosponding dataPage. I don't think that's the way to do it because it violates the data model and will get us in a lot of trouble later on when other sites (like Commons) might implement the Wikibase extension.
A WikibasePage should work the same as a normal page when it comes to fetching data. It should have the initial version (just a title, no content) and once you use a function that needs data (or you force it), it will fetch all the data from Wikibase and caches it.
- For an item the data looks like
https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&ids=Q256638&...
- For a property the data looks like
https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&ids=P22&form... Parts of the data (description, aliases and labels) should be processed in the get function of WikibasePage, other parts in ItemPage /PropertyPage
Based on the api we should probably have some generators:
- One or more generator that uses wbgetentities to (pre-)fetch objects
- A search generator that uses wbsearchentities
WikibasePage:
- Set/add/delete label (@property?)
- Set/add/delete description (@property?)
- Set/add/delete alias (@property?)
ItemPage
- Set/add/delete sitelink (@property?)
Claim logic
Not sure how we can use wbeditentity and wblinktitles
We took some notes on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Pywikipediabot/Wikidata/Rewrite_propos....
What do you think? Is this the right direction? Feedback is appreciated.
Maarten
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Pywikipedia-l mailing listPywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
You can count on about writing the code :) Tell me if need more hands
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Yuri Astrakhan yuriastrakhan@gmail.comwrote:
Of course, the goal is to keep (and even enhance) the current functionality. And yes, there will be a significant overlap when both api's would function. The main reason for posting it now is so that whoever decides to implement it would know the wikidata api roadmap and plan accordingly. Plus I hope for a ton of good suggestions :)
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Maarten Dammers maarten@mdammers.nlwrote:
Hi Yurik,
Op 2-3-2013 17:00, Yuri Astrakhan schreef:
I would also like to bring up the pending Wikidata API RFC at http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Wikidata_API
Thanks for pointing that out.
In that RFC I plan to unify Wikidata API to be more seamlessly integrated with the core query API. Any feedback from pywiki community is welcome.
If we can still functionally do the same what I described below you probably won't get any complaints from this side. Is that the case? Can you please include a period of overlap of old-style and new-style api so we have time to update the framework?
Maarten
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Maarten Dammers maarten@mdammers.nlwrote:
Hi everyone,
As you might know phase 1 of Wikidata (interwiki links) is live at a lot of Wikipedia's and soon to be turned on for all Wikipedia's. Phase 2 is next, that's basically about infobox data. We are going to need a lot of clever bots to fill Wikidata. To make that possible Pywikipedia should (properly) implement Wikidata. That way bot authors don't have to worry or care about the inner workings of the Wikidata api, they just talk to the framework. At the moment trunk has a first implementation that isn't very clean and in the rewrite it's still missing.
Legoktm and I talked about this on irc. We need to have a proper data model in Pywikipedia. Based on https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/Data_model_primer :
- WikibasePage is a subclass of Page and has some basic shared functions
for labels, descriptions and aliases
- ItemPage is a subclass of WikibasePage with some item specific
functions like claims and sitelinks (example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q256638)
- PropertyPage is a subclass of WikibasePage with some property specific
functions for the datatype (example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P22)
- QueryPage is a subclass of WikibasePage for the future query type
- Claim is a subclass of object for claims. Simplified: It's a property
(P22, father) attached to an item (Q256638, the princes) linking to another item (Q380949, Willem IV)
You can get these pages like a normal page (site object + title), but you probably also want to get them based on a Wikipedia page. For that there is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:ItemByTitle/enwiki/Princess%20Carolina.... We should have a staticmethod itemByPage(Page) in which Page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Carolina_of_Orange-Nassau and it will give you the itemPage object for https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q256638. Currently in trunk the DataPage object has a constructor where you can give a page object and you'll get the corrosponding dataPage. I don't think that's the way to do it because it violates the data model and will get us in a lot of trouble later on when other sites (like Commons) might implement the Wikibase extension.
A WikibasePage should work the same as a normal page when it comes to fetching data. It should have the initial version (just a title, no content) and once you use a function that needs data (or you force it), it will fetch all the data from Wikibase and caches it.
- For an item the data looks like
https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&ids=Q256638&...
- For a property the data looks like
https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&ids=P22&form... Parts of the data (description, aliases and labels) should be processed in the get function of WikibasePage, other parts in ItemPage /PropertyPage
Based on the api we should probably have some generators:
- One or more generator that uses wbgetentities to (pre-)fetch objects
- A search generator that uses wbsearchentities
WikibasePage:
- Set/add/delete label (@property?)
- Set/add/delete description (@property?)
- Set/add/delete alias (@property?)
ItemPage
- Set/add/delete sitelink (@property?)
Claim logic
Not sure how we can use wbeditentity and wblinktitles
We took some notes on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Pywikipediabot/Wikidata/Rewrite_propos....
What do you think? Is this the right direction? Feedback is appreciated.
Maarten
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Pywikipedia-l mailing listPywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Hehe, I could always use more hands - especially if you want to try reworking the server-side wikidata API. Right now is the best time to do it, otherwise lots more bots will be written for the current API, and it will be so much harder to change.
Lets start with cleaning up the API specification at http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Wikidata_API
I need to iron out * generator - ability to search wikidata based on some parameters to get a list of items (Q pages) * props - ability to request specific information from each Q page
This should get us started, as coding should be easy once we know exactly what we need :) Thanks!
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Amir Ladsgroup ladsgroup@gmail.com wrote:
You can count on about writing the code :) Tell me if need more hands
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Yuri Astrakhan yuriastrakhan@gmail.comwrote:
Of course, the goal is to keep (and even enhance) the current functionality. And yes, there will be a significant overlap when both api's would function. The main reason for posting it now is so that whoever decides to implement it would know the wikidata api roadmap and plan accordingly. Plus I hope for a ton of good suggestions :)
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Maarten Dammers maarten@mdammers.nlwrote:
Hi Yurik,
Op 2-3-2013 17:00, Yuri Astrakhan schreef:
I would also like to bring up the pending Wikidata API RFC at http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Wikidata_API
Thanks for pointing that out.
In that RFC I plan to unify Wikidata API to be more seamlessly integrated with the core query API. Any feedback from pywiki community is welcome.
If we can still functionally do the same what I described below you probably won't get any complaints from this side. Is that the case? Can you please include a period of overlap of old-style and new-style api so we have time to update the framework?
Maarten
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Maarten Dammers maarten@mdammers.nlwrote:
Hi everyone,
As you might know phase 1 of Wikidata (interwiki links) is live at a lot of Wikipedia's and soon to be turned on for all Wikipedia's. Phase 2 is next, that's basically about infobox data. We are going to need a lot of clever bots to fill Wikidata. To make that possible Pywikipedia should (properly) implement Wikidata. That way bot authors don't have to worry or care about the inner workings of the Wikidata api, they just talk to the framework. At the moment trunk has a first implementation that isn't very clean and in the rewrite it's still missing.
Legoktm and I talked about this on irc. We need to have a proper data model in Pywikipedia. Based on https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/Data_model_primer :
- WikibasePage is a subclass of Page and has some basic shared
functions for labels, descriptions and aliases
- ItemPage is a subclass of WikibasePage with some item specific
functions like claims and sitelinks (example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q256638)
- PropertyPage is a subclass of WikibasePage with some property
specific functions for the datatype (example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P22)
- QueryPage is a subclass of WikibasePage for the future query type
- Claim is a subclass of object for claims. Simplified: It's a property
(P22, father) attached to an item (Q256638, the princes) linking to another item (Q380949, Willem IV)
You can get these pages like a normal page (site object + title), but you probably also want to get them based on a Wikipedia page. For that there is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:ItemByTitle/enwiki/Princess%20Carolina.... We should have a staticmethod itemByPage(Page) in which Page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Carolina_of_Orange-Nassau and it will give you the itemPage object for https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q256638. Currently in trunk the DataPage object has a constructor where you can give a page object and you'll get the corrosponding dataPage. I don't think that's the way to do it because it violates the data model and will get us in a lot of trouble later on when other sites (like Commons) might implement the Wikibase extension.
A WikibasePage should work the same as a normal page when it comes to fetching data. It should have the initial version (just a title, no content) and once you use a function that needs data (or you force it), it will fetch all the data from Wikibase and caches it.
- For an item the data looks like
https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&ids=Q256638&...
- For a property the data looks like
https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&ids=P22&form... Parts of the data (description, aliases and labels) should be processed in the get function of WikibasePage, other parts in ItemPage /PropertyPage
Based on the api we should probably have some generators:
- One or more generator that uses wbgetentities to (pre-)fetch objects
- A search generator that uses wbsearchentities
WikibasePage:
- Set/add/delete label (@property?)
- Set/add/delete description (@property?)
- Set/add/delete alias (@property?)
ItemPage
- Set/add/delete sitelink (@property?)
Claim logic
Not sure how we can use wbeditentity and wblinktitles
We took some notes on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Pywikipediabot/Wikidata/Rewrite_propos....
What do you think? Is this the right direction? Feedback is appreciated.
Maarten
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Pywikipedia-l mailing listPywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
-- Amir
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org