Hello all!
I am searching desperately for a solution to following problem. DrTrigonBot is written such that in case of an (not severe) error the bot should send an email with a notification to me. BUT the strange thing I do not understand is; userlib.py is not able to send emails about 50% of the tries...
Some info can be found in (at the very end): http://toolserver.org/~drtrigon/DrTrigonBot/20110724.log
The error raised is 'UserActionRefuse("You don't have permission to send mail",)'
Does anyone have an idea how to solve this? In my view this is triggered by "if not self.site().isAllowed('sendemail'):" in "userlib.sendMail" but WHY is this 'sendemail' flags sometimes true and sometimes false...?!?
Thanks a lot for your help and time Greetings to all! DrTrigon
Could you post the code you are using to send emails?
On 24 July 2011 11:22, Dr. Trigon dr.trigon@surfeu.ch wrote:
Hello all!
I am searching desperately for a solution to following problem. DrTrigonBot is written such that in case of an (not severe) error the bot should send an email with a notification to me. BUT the strange thing I do not understand is; userlib.py is not able to send emails about 50% of the tries...
Some info can be found in (at the very end): http://toolserver.org/~drtrigon/DrTrigonBot/20110724.log
The error raised is 'UserActionRefuse("You don't have permission to send mail",)'
Does anyone have an idea how to solve this? In my view this is triggered by "if not self.site().isAllowed('sendemail'):" in "userlib.sendMail" but WHY is this 'sendemail' flags sometimes true and sometimes false...?!?
Thanks a lot for your help and time Greetings to all! DrTrigon
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Of course! (sorry - I should have thought of this by myself... ;)
The code is attached (sorry for the ugly formatting) or given in [1] at member function 'send_mailnotification'.
I have also to say, it's using 'trunk' (not re-write) and rev. 8990.
The 'while' loop was introduced to do 3 re-tries (brute force) but does not help at all. My next idea would be to include the creation of the user object
usr = userlib.User(pywikibot.getSite(), error_mail[0])
also into the loop, but this would also be simple trial'n'error (brute force). This is because I have no idea where the problem originates from. Is it because of wrong/old token, wrong flags, ... ?!?
[1] http://toolserver.org/~drtrigon/websvn-2.3.1/filedetails.php?repname=drtrigo...
Greetings
Am 24.07.2011 12:19, schrieb Merlijn van Deen:
Could you post the code you are using to send emails?
On 24 July 2011 11:22, Dr. Trigon <dr.trigon@surfeu.ch mailto:dr.trigon@surfeu.ch> wrote:
Hello all! I am searching desperately for a solution to following problem. DrTrigonBot is written such that in case of an (not severe) error the bot should send an email with a notification to me. BUT the strange thing I do not understand is; userlib.py is not able to send emails about 50% of the tries... Some info can be found in (at the very end): http://toolserver.org/~drtrigon/DrTrigonBot/20110724.log The error raised is 'UserActionRefuse("You don't have permission to send mail",)' Does anyone have an idea how to solve this? In my view this is triggered by "if not self.site().isAllowed('sendemail'):" in "userlib.sendMail" but WHY is this 'sendemail' flags sometimes true and sometimes false...?!? Thanks a lot for your help and time Greetings to all! DrTrigon _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
*%(%ç%ç(%!! ... :)
sorry - was clicking too fast... here the attachement...
Greetings
Am 24.07.2011 12:19, schrieb Merlijn van Deen:
Could you post the code you are using to send emails?
On 24 July 2011 11:22, Dr. Trigon <dr.trigon@surfeu.ch mailto:dr.trigon@surfeu.ch> wrote:
Hello all! I am searching desperately for a solution to following problem. DrTrigonBot is written such that in case of an (not severe) error the bot should send an email with a notification to me. BUT the strange thing I do not understand is; userlib.py is not able to send emails about 50% of the tries... Some info can be found in (at the very end): http://toolserver.org/~drtrigon/DrTrigonBot/20110724.log The error raised is 'UserActionRefuse("You don't have permission to send mail",)' Does anyone have an idea how to solve this? In my view this is triggered by "if not self.site().isAllowed('sendemail'):" in "userlib.sendMail" but WHY is this 'sendemail' flags sometimes true and sometimes false...?!? Thanks a lot for your help and time Greetings to all! DrTrigon _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Try to write a line just before the e-mail sending that checks if your bot is still logged in. Is it possible that sometimes it loses the logged-in status?
Since all edits are correctly assigned to the bot compare e.g. [1] and the bot log [2] (at the very end), you can see:
- edits are assigned to the bot account - last edit was at '2011/07/24 08:53:24' and bot mailing failed at '2011/07/24 08:53:38' which was 14 secs later - but the bot runned 4 hrs before without logging out...
So it may be possible but as far as I can see the bot had never problems with un-expected log-out... just with mailing...
What do you think?
[1] http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Beitr%C3%A4ge/DrTrigonBot [2] http://toolserver.org/~drtrigon/DrTrigonBot/20110724.log
Am 24.07.2011 17:41, schrieb Bináris:
Try to write a line just before the e-mail sending that checks if your bot is still logged in. Is it possible that sometimes it loses the logged-in status? -- Bináris
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
2011/7/24 Dr. Trigon dr.trigon@surfeu.ch
What do you think?
No other idea at the moment. :-(
On 24 July 2011 11:22, Dr. Trigon dr.trigon@surfeu.ch wrote:
BUT the strange thing I do not understand is; userlib.py is not able to send emails about 50% of the tries...
Some info can be found in (at the very end): http://toolserver.org/~drtrigon/DrTrigonBot/20110724.log
Do you have any idea when this happens? The log you mention only shows a single mailing attempt.
Could it be it only works from one of your accounts and not from another?
Have you tried sending an e-mail manually? (i.e. logging into your bot account and using Special:EmailUser, or whatever it's called). Does that work?
Best, Merlijn
Do you have any idea when this happens? The log you mention only shows a single mailing attempt.
No - thats basically the reason why I'm asking this question here...
Could it be it only works from one of your accounts and not from another?
What do you exactly mean? I have 1 bot account only. This one exists for years and mailing worked fine in the past (I had written my own mailing routine/function until I discovered the one in the framework) at least until we had to change to use SGE and cronie on the toolserver (instead of crontab)... but I don't know if this is affected by toolserver changes (as far as I understand - it should NOT)
Have you tried sending an e-mail manually? (i.e. logging into your bot account and using Special:EmailUser, or whatever it's called). Does that work?
As mentioned in the past mailing from the bot and bot account worked and anyway it works even now, but just 50% of the times (roughly guessed)... In fact it worked the day before as visible from another log in [1]. (In the past I even had a "MailerBot" running - that had mailing as only job)
It is a somehow frustrating thing; if I had a clue what could be the reason I would add more debugging output... And DO more debugging in the bot - but as you can see this is a rare and alternating bug which makes tracking down hard...
Greetings
[1] http://toolserver.org/~drtrigon/DrTrigonBot/20110723.log
Could it be it only works from one of your accounts and not from another?
What do you exactly mean? I have 1 bot account only. This one exists for years and mailing worked fine in the past
OK. Based on the error, I suspected it was a message from the wiki. Of course, you already noted in your first mail that the message is from the framework. Silly me.
(userlib.py) 195 if not self.site().isAllowed('sendemail'): 196 raise UserActionRefuse('You don't have permission to send mail')
isAllowed is called on the site object, in your case dewikipedia:
(wikipedia.py) 5031 self._load(sysop = sysop) 5032 index = self._userIndex(sysop) (...) 5037 return right in self._rights[index]
so it might be interesting to check what yoursite._rights contains. It might be the api returns incorrect values.
so this is what I would suggest: change your code from:
def send_mailnotification(self, item): pywikibot.output(u'Sending mail "%s" to "%s" as notification!' % (error_mail[1], error_mail[0])) usr = userlib.User(pywikibot.getSite(), error_mail[0])
to something like:
def send_mailnotification(self, item): pywikibot.output(u'Sending mail "%s" to "%s" as notification!' % (error_mail[1], error_mail[0])) site = pywikibot.getSite() pywikibot.output(u'Allowed to send email: %r' % (site.isAllowed('sendemail'),) pywikibot.output(u'Permissions: %r' % (site._rights,) usr = userlib.User(pywikibot.getSite(), error_mail[0])
of course, ._rights is internal and should not generally be used like this. It's a helpful debugging tool, though.
You could also run the script through pdb to do post-mortem debugging. This would allow you to check out the problem more directly.
The recent edits to the framework that could be related are: http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/pywikipedia/trunk/pywikipedia/wikipedia.py?r... * (jun 5)* * http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/pywikipedia/trunk/pywikipedia/wikipedia.py?r... (mar 20, does not really seem related)* * * all other recent changes are, as far as I can see, purely cosmetic.
So I would suggest: 1) see what site._rights contains, and if this does not give any useful results, 2) try to see if the problem is introduced in r9288 (see if r9287 works).
Best, Merlijn * *
so it might be interesting to check what yoursite._rights contains. It might be the api returns incorrect values.
aaaaahhh... this sheds light on my problem...
I did the changes you suggested and now we have to wait... ;) By the way, since it could be possible
site = pywikibot.getSite()
to give other results between different calls (beacuse of the API), I used the same 'site' object later for the user object
usr = userlib.User(site, error_mail[0])
(just to be sure... ;)
of course, ._rights is internal and should not generally be used like this. It's a helpful debugging tool, though.
Since we are in debugging; EVERYTHING is allowed... ;) by the way, that is one of reasons why I like python that much; even if something SHOULD NOT generally be used like this, it CAN BE USED like this... ;))
You could also run the script through pdb to do post-mortem debugging. This would allow you to check out the problem more directly.
This is a good hint! But since the bot runs for about 4 hrs (and on the toolserver) I'm not sure if this is applicable and how... May be with a 'screen' on TS to come back to after running the bot...? (I have to admit, I using 'pdb' not that often...)
The recent edits to the framework that could be related are: http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/pywikipedia/trunk/pywikipedia/wikipedia.py?r... http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/pywikipedia/trunk/pywikipedia/wikipedia.py?r1=9287&r2=9288&* (jun 5)* *http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/pywikipedia/trunk/pywikipedia/wikipedia.py?r... http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/pywikipedia/trunk/pywikipedia/wikipedia.py?r1=9036&r2=9037&pathrev=9159& (mar 20, does not really seem related)*
Thanks for investigationg on this!!
So I would suggest: 1) see what site._rights contains, and if this does not give any useful results, 2) try to see if the problem is introduced in r9288 (see if r9287 works).
So I did the changes mentioned in 1) to get more output. Depending on those results I will either consider 2) or have to come back to you... (should NOT be a threat... ;)) Anyway thanks a lot so far for your help, hints and time!
Thanks a lot and Greetings DrTrigon
So I would suggest: 1) see what site._rights contains, and if this does not give any useful results, 2) try to see if the problem is introduced in r9288 (see if r9287 works).
So I did the changes mentioned in 1) to get more output. Depending on those results I will either consider 2) or have to come back to you... (should NOT be a threat... ;)) Anyway thanks a lot so far for your help, hints and time!
Today was an intressting day, because of other issues, I runned the bot twice, with the same code regarding the mail stuff, here what I got the first run:
2011/08/06 04:45:45:: Sending mail "Bot ERROR" to "DrTrigon" as notification! 2011/08/06 04:45:45:: !!! Allowed to send email: True 2011/08/06 04:45:45:: !!! Permissions: [[u'move', u'autoreview', u'move-rootuserpages', u'createtalk', u'minoredit', u'movestable', u'skipcaptcha', u'nominornewtalk', u'noratelimit', u'*', u'collectionsaveasuserpage', u'abusefilter-view', u'abusefilter-log-detail', u'createpage', u'writeapi', u'createaccount', u'centralauth-merge', u'read', u'autopatrol', u'abusefilter-log', u'suppressredirect', u'user', u'collectionsaveascommunitypage', u'reupload-own', u'apihighlimits', u'autoconfirmed', u'edit', u'sendemail', u'bot', u'upload', u'purge', u'reupload'], None] 2011/08/06 04:45:45:: Email sent.
and here the second run:
2011/08/06 18:28:37:: Sending mail "Bot ERROR" to "DrTrigon" as notification! 2011/08/06 18:28:37:: !!! Allowed to send email: False 2011/08/06 18:28:37:: !!! Permissions: [['user', 'bot', 'autoconfirmed', 'read', 'createaccount', 'edit', 'upload', 'createpage', 'createtalk', 'move', 'upload', 'apihighlimits'], None] 2011/08/06 18:28:37:: !!! (<class 'userlib.UserActionRefuse'>, UserActionRefuse("You don't have permission to send mail",), <traceback object at 0x8a20cd4>) 2011/08/06 18:28:37:: !!! WARNING: mail could not be sent!
as you can see the first worked and the second not. In the first the bot got a long list of rights and in the second and short...
The point mentioned in 2) regarding revisions r9288 and r9287 does not apply here as I can see because I using the rather old r8990 anyway...
Any idea where those differences come from?
Thanks a lot (so far) and Greetings Dr.Trigon
Link to log file: http://toolserver.org/~drtrigon/DrTrigonBot/20110806.log
Hello,
On 6 August 2011 18:55, Dr. Trigon dr.trigon@surfeu.ch wrote:
2011/08/06 04:45:45:: !!! Permissions: [[u'move', u'autoreview', u'move-rootuserpages', u'createtalk', u'minoredit', u'movestable', u'skipcaptcha', u'nominornewtalk', u'noratelimit', u'*', u'collectionsaveasuserpage', u'abusefilter-view', u'abusefilter-log-detail', u'createpage', u'writeapi', u'createaccount', u'centralauth-merge', u'read', u'autopatrol', u'abusefilter-log', u'suppressredirect', u'user', u'collectionsaveascommunitypage', u'reupload-own', u'apihighlimits', u'autoconfirmed', u'edit', u'sendemail', u'bot', u'upload', u'purge', u'reupload'], None] 2011/08/06 04:45:45:: Email sent.
and here the second run:
2011/08/06 18:28:37:: !!! Permissions: [['user', 'bot', 'autoconfirmed', 'read', 'createaccount', 'edit', 'upload', 'createpage', 'createtalk', 'move', 'upload', 'apihighlimits'], None]
First of all, sorry for the slow response. I haven't had time to look into this (and I still haven't). From the top of my head, the following (hoping someone else will be able to further assist): I *think* the list " [['user', 'bot', 'autoconfirmed','read', 'createaccount', 'edit', 'upload', 'createpage', 'createtalk','move', 'upload', 'apihighlimits'], None] " is somewhere in the bot code (wikipedia.py:5691 and further) to take as 'default' when no response (or a bogus response) is returned from the server. If not, the server might *actually* be responding with that data, in which case the server is at fault.
If it *is* the default list, I think this should be fixed. It does not make much sense to me to apply a selective default list if no response is returned -- either retry or assume we can do anything. Then again, the latter means the bot would crash when trying to lock without lock rights.
In essence: this needs some thought.
For your problem: try calling Site.getToken(getagain=True) when you get the exception, and retry. (this calls self._load(force=True) and throug there _getUserDataOld(force=True). It's hackish, but the best I can come up with for the moment.
Best, Merlijn
First of all, sorry for the slow response. I haven't had time to look into this (and I still haven't). From the top of my head, the following (hoping someone else will be able to further assist):
No problem - in fact you responded 3 days later - compared to the delays I produce regularly... ;))
I *think* the list " [['user', 'bot', 'autoconfirmed','read', 'createaccount', 'edit', 'upload', 'createpage', 'createtalk','move', 'upload', 'apihighlimits'], None] " is somewhere in the bot code (wikipedia.py:5691 and further) to take as 'default' when no response (or a bogus response) is returned from the server. If not, the server might *actually* be responding with that data, in which case the server is at fault.
This sounds reasonable. I had a look into those code parts and agree with you and am also "hoping someone else will be able to further assist"... This would be great since it looks like some core code. As far as I can see 'Site.getToken' is called in most of the page class member funcs such as get, put, ... so I am confused because they all work in my code. Do you have any idea whats the initial (first) call of 'Site.getToken' in the code - the one that seams to produce the problems we encounter here...?
If it *is* the default list, I think this should be fixed. It does not make much sense to me to apply a selective default list if no response is returned -- either retry or assume we can do anything. Then again, the latter means the bot would crash when trying to lock without lock rights.
In essence: this needs some thought.
Shall I issue a bug report in tracker on sf.net?
For your problem: try calling Site.getToken(getagain=True) when you get the exception, and retry. (this calls self._load(force=True) and throug there _getUserDataOld(force=True). It's hackish, but the best I can come up with for the moment.
Hackish? You never looked at my bot code, did you? ;))
I inserted following code lines:
if not site.isAllowed('sendemail'): pywikibot.output(u'!!! Try getting new token: %r' % \ (site.getToken(getagain=True),))
So we have to wait again... ;) (may be I have to think about how to try to force such errors...)
Thanks for all your support and time!
Greetings Dr. Trigon
Hello all!
When looking http://toolserver.org/~drtrigon/DrTrigonBot/20110820.log at the very end you will see:
2011/08/21 00:08:09:: Sending mail "Bot ERROR" to "DrTrigon" as notification! 2011/08/21 00:08:09:: !!! Allowed to send email: False 2011/08/21 00:08:09:: !!! Permissions: [['user', 'bot', 'autoconfirmed', 'read', 'createaccount', 'edit', 'upload', 'createpage', 'createtalk', 'move', 'upload', 'apihighlimits'], None] 2011/08/21 00:08:09:: Getting a token. 2011/08/21 00:08:09:: !!! Try getting new token: u'4ac3be5a7d488cbd4f36f5b9c3cd522d+\' 2011/08/21 00:08:09:: Email sent.
this means, the hint given:
For your problem: try calling Site.getToken(getagain=True) when you get the exception, and retry. (this calls self._load(force=True) and throug
finally works!
The last point is now to figure out why site.getToken sometimes is called properly and sometimes not...???
Thanks for all your help! Greetings Dr. Trigon
Am 09.08.2011 21:32, schrieb Dr. Trigon:
First of all, sorry for the slow response. I haven't had time to look into this (and I still haven't). From the top of my head, the following (hoping someone else will be able to further assist):
No problem - in fact you responded 3 days later - compared to the delays I produce regularly... ;))
I *think* the list " [['user', 'bot', 'autoconfirmed','read', 'createaccount', 'edit', 'upload', 'createpage', 'createtalk','move', 'upload', 'apihighlimits'], None] " is somewhere in the bot code (wikipedia.py:5691 and further) to take as 'default' when no response (or a bogus response) is returned from the server. If not, the server might *actually* be responding with that data, in which case the server is at fault.
This sounds reasonable. I had a look into those code parts and agree with you and am also "hoping someone else will be able to further assist"... This would be great since it looks like some core code. As far as I can see 'Site.getToken' is called in most of the page class member funcs such as get, put, ... so I am confused because they all work in my code. Do you have any idea whats the initial (first) call of 'Site.getToken' in the code - the one that seams to produce the problems we encounter here...?
If it *is* the default list, I think this should be fixed. It does not make much sense to me to apply a selective default list if no response is returned -- either retry or assume we can do anything. Then again, the latter means the bot would crash when trying to lock without lock rights.
In essence: this needs some thought.
Shall I issue a bug report in tracker on sf.net?
For your problem: try calling Site.getToken(getagain=True) when you get the exception, and retry. (this calls self._load(force=True) and throug there _getUserDataOld(force=True). It's hackish, but the best I can come up with for the moment.
Hackish? You never looked at my bot code, did you? ;))
I inserted following code lines:
if not site.isAllowed('sendemail'): pywikibot.output(u'!!! Try getting new token: %r' % \ (site.getToken(getagain=True),))
So we have to wait again... ;) (may be I have to think about how to try to force such errors...)
Thanks for all your support and time!
Greetings Dr. Trigon
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Hello Dr. Trigon,
this means, the hint given:
For your problem: try calling Site.getToken(getagain=True) when you get the exception, and retry. (this calls self._load(force=True) and throug
finally works!
The last point is now to figure out why site.getToken sometimes is called properly and sometimes not...???
Intuitively, I think this is what happens: sometimes when requesting a token, the connection is reset (or something equivalent) - this is why it only happens every now and then. This is then interpreted by the framework as 'hey, we cannot get the data right now, so let's assume something more-or-less sensible'.
By calling Site.getToken(getagain=True), you force the framework to retry getting that data, which succeeds after which you can send the e-mail.
Best, Merlijn
Intuitively, I think this is what happens: sometimes when requesting a token, the connection is reset (or something equivalent) - this is why it only happens every now and then. This is then interpreted by the framework as 'hey, we cannot get the data right now, so let's assume something more-or-less sensible'.
Sound reasonable... But as we try to get a piece of productive software, honestly I do not feel good with terms like "Intuitively" and "reasonable"... ;) In my opinion the source of this (miss)behaviour should be tracked down. Thus I filed a bug report at sf.net:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3397944&group_id=93...
Thanks again, greetings
Dr. Trigon dr.trigon@surfeu.ch wrote: Intuitively, I think this is what happens: sometimes when requesting a token, the connection is reset (or something equivalent) - this is why it only happens every now and then. This is then interpreted by the framework as 'hey, we cannot get the data right now, so let's assume something more-or-less sensible'.
Sound reasonable... But as we try to get a piece of productive software, honestly I do not feel good with terms like "Intuitively" and "reasonable"... ;) In my opinion the source of this (miss)behaviour should be tracked down. Thus I filed a bug report at sf.net:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3397944&group_id=93...
You should never assume that the network you are using is stable and always produces desired results. It can be down to everything, like authentication problems, caching problems at wikimedia or network issues.
Sure, it might be a real problem, but it's most probably on the side of MediaWiki (or actually Wikimedia installation) rather than the framework.
//Saper
I guess this was introduced in r5037 (Reorganization of the user data retrieving: moving it to a single function.) with _getUserData() renamed to _getUserDataOld() now but I don't see the point for "Assume the user has the default rights". Maybe this is good enough for screen-scrapped pages.
Greetings xqt
----- Original Nachricht ---- Von: Merlijn van Deen valhallasw@arctus.nl An: Pywikipedia discussion list pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Datum: 09.08.2011 17:04 Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] No permission to send mail...
Hello,
On 6 August 2011 18:55, Dr. Trigon dr.trigon@surfeu.ch wrote:
2011/08/06 04:45:45:: !!! Permissions: [[u'move', u'autoreview', u'move-rootuserpages', u'createtalk', u'minoredit', u'movestable', u'skipcaptcha', u'nominornewtalk', u'noratelimit', u'*', u'collectionsaveasuserpage', u'abusefilter-view', u'abusefilter-log-detail', u'createpage', u'writeapi', u'createaccount', u'centralauth-merge', u'read', u'autopatrol', u'abusefilter-log', u'suppressredirect', u'user', u'collectionsaveascommunitypage', u'reupload-own', u'apihighlimits', u'autoconfirmed', u'edit', u'sendemail', u'bot', u'upload', u'purge', u'reupload'], None] 2011/08/06 04:45:45:: Email sent.
and here the second run:
2011/08/06 18:28:37:: !!! Permissions: [['user', 'bot', 'autoconfirmed', 'read', 'createaccount', 'edit', 'upload', 'createpage', 'createtalk', 'move', 'upload', 'apihighlimits'], None]
First of all, sorry for the slow response. I haven't had time to look into this (and I still haven't). From the top of my head, the following (hoping someone else will be able to further assist): I *think* the list " [['user', 'bot', 'autoconfirmed','read', 'createaccount', 'edit', 'upload', 'createpage', 'createtalk','move', 'upload', 'apihighlimits'], None] " is somewhere in the bot code (wikipedia.py:5691 and further) to take as 'default' when no response (or a bogus response) is returned from the server. If not, the server might *actually* be responding with that data, in which case the server is at fault.
If it *is* the default list, I think this should be fixed. It does not make much sense to me to apply a selective default list if no response is returned -- either retry or assume we can do anything. Then again, the latter means the bot would crash when trying to lock without lock rights.
In essence: this needs some thought.
For your problem: try calling Site.getToken(getagain=True) when you get the exception, and retry. (this calls self._load(force=True) and throug there _getUserDataOld(force=True). It's hackish, but the best I can come up with for the moment.
Best, Merlijn
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
Arcor empfiehlt: Die TOP 1000 Surftipps zu allem, was im Internet interessant und spannend ist - sehen Sie hier: http://www.arcor.de/content/pc_technik/internet/surftipps/surftipps/
pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org