I shoudnt have to set wikipedia.setLogfileStatus(True) in all my scripts just because someone cant be bothered to implement their logging code correctly. Moving to pre-configred git sub modules would do the same thing, without running exicutibles on windows computers. Just because someone haphazardly threw stuff together without thinking it through doesnt mean its acceptable
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Amir Ladsgroup ladsgroup@gmail.com wrote:
See this: http://sourceforge.net/p/pywikipediabot/bugs/1633/
The problem is we can't set all of patches for all of users. So many people are not interested in running IRC bots or image handling bots, so They don't need to download almost 100M for that
Best
On 8/24/13, John phoenixoverride@gmail.com wrote:
Another point that is really frustrating is the logging system that complains about not having a logger defined if you run any custom
scripts.
The only way that I have found to shut this up is to enable logging for
all
scripts, however I end up with thousands of log files. (each pid creates its own file. and if you use muti-processing that ends up with thousands
or
hundreds of thousands of log files)
Also It shoudnt be querying git on every script invocation or at all
unless
version.py is manually called. that kind of overhead is just bloat (with perhaps the exception of interwiki.py).
if externals are needed and they need to be patched the best thing to to would include them pre-patched in our own sub-module, that way you can avoid the whole can of worms
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Merlijn van Deen valhallasw@arctus.nlwrote:
Hi John,
On 23 August 2013 00:36, John phoenixoverride@gmail.com wrote:
The final straw was when I just converted to Git and discovered that he is trying to run executables.
I think most of us agree using patch.exe was not the best decision. However, creating a way to install dependencies locally, which also
works
well for windows users - unfortunately, virtualenv and others don't work too well for some windows workflows, I think was a sensible idea.
This is bloatware plain and simple I have seen the number of externals go from 2 to 17. Most of these are probably for one or two pet programs that should never have been added to the project as they are niche programs.
I don't agree on this - the number of externals that /can be installed/ has increased, but the only one required is BeautifulSoup. This is not different from how things were before. Thanks to the new packaging system, you are only asked to install them when required. Yes, they are
typically
for one or two scripts, but calling them 'pet programs' is just nonsense
the scripts DrTrigon has added (e.g. sum_disc/discussion summaries, subster/dynamic page updating from an external source, catimages/smart(er) image categorization based on content) are useful tools, even though Dr Trigon might be the only one running them at the moment.
I would really like to see things streamlined and all of the cruft removed and get back to the nice library that we had.
Apart from the patch.exe issue, I', not really sure what there is to streamline - the extra externals are only installed on demand and the
new
scripts are not in the way of using other scripts.
Merlijn
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
-- Amir
Pywikipedia-l mailing list Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l