Patches item #2985564, was opened at 2010-04-11 21:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xqt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603140&aid=2985564...

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Postponed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: masti (masti01) Assigned to: xqt (xqt) Summary: cosmetic_changes.py

Initial Comment: if the link and description are the same except for capitalisation use link as link skipping description. Useful for cleaning up after capitalisation related redirects cleaning. Example: http://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=21129378&oldid=21129374&rci...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: xqt (xqt)

Date: 2010-04-12 16:20

Message: Wouldn't it be a better way to fix that behavior in the main script? For example: I use a modificated solve_disambiguation.py which always uses the page link without the description for disambig pages which is recommended in de-wiki. Put it could cause problems with articles. The point is: you could not have any influence to cc but you may have it on fixing_redirects or solve_disambiguation as an option if using it in non-autonomous mode. And I coundn't say that this sort of spelling-correction alway works well.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: masti (masti01) Date: 2010-04-12 15:39

Message: I use that in case we are moving pages due to the fact of misspelling or wrong capitalisation of article title. Then when fixing_redirects or using solve_disambiguation we have a proper link but the description stays wrong.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: xqt (xqt) Date: 2010-04-12 13:12

Message: I am not sure whether this is a good idea of cause this does spelling changes overruling human edits. If running this in autonomous mode we must enshure the result is always right. That's why I would like to wait for other comments.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603140&aid=2985564...