Feature Requests item #3544335, was opened at 2012-07-15 03:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by yfdyh000 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=3544335...
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Interface Improvements Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: YFdyh000 (yfdyh000) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Run in -async mode, the logs sequence mess
Initial Comment: In asynchronous mode, recommended to wait for the same page update details full output, then insert other information. "Updating links on page [[xx:XXX]]" should not be inserted into the middle of the Continuous log. The "Changes to be made:" of Same page should be with a continuous output.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: YFdyh000 (yfdyh000)
Date: 2012-07-15 08:50
Message: I mean is all associated pages of a page as a unit to output and updates, rather than each page as a unit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Merlijn S. van Deen (valhallasw) Date: 2012-07-15 08:43
Message: What you want is not really clear to me, but I suppose you want to let the bot stall when there are 10 pages waiting to be saved?
What would be the use case for that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: YFdyh000 (yfdyh000) Date: 2012-07-15 08:38
Message: Oh. The following idea feasible?
Suppose a situation: # max_queue_size = 10 ... # The current waiting put queue is 9 Getting 60 pages from wikipedia:en... # Add 10+ pages to the put queue at same time # The current waiting put queue is 19+ ======Post-processing [[en:xxx]]====== "Updating links on page [[en:xxx]]." 10+ ... "Updating page [[en:xxx]] via API" 10+ "Getting 60 pages from wikipedia:de..." ......
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Merlijn S. van Deen (valhallasw) Date: 2012-07-15 08:14
Message: That does not make any sense to me. If we have to wait for the update so we can have the output from the script and from the async save routine in the same place, the entire advantage of async saving is gone!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=3544335...