Bugs item #2827630, was opened at 2009-07-27 10:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xqt
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603138&aid=2827630&group_…
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 4
Private: No
Submitted By: xqt (xqt)
>Assigned to: xqt (xqt)
Summary: hard-coded defaultsort
Initial Comment:
Pywikipedia [http] trunk/pywikipedia (r7097, 2009/07/26, 14:18:13)
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Feb 21 2008, 13:11:45) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)
I found a hard-codes "DEFAULTSORT" in wikipedia.py but there ar localized tags and maybe it should be fixed to prevent some side effects or bugs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: xqt (xqt)
Date: 2010-02-08 16:37
Message:
self.done in r7919
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603138&aid=2827630&group_…
Patches item #2946258, was opened at 2010-02-04 18:41
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by andreasjs
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603140&aid=2946258&group_…
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: AndreasJS (andreasjs)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Remove spurious error message from _putPageOld
Initial Comment:
Updating pages the old way (no API) would output error message even with success, p;us a dump of the updated page.
ndreas-schwabs-computer-2:pywikipedia andreas$ python basic.py -lang:en -family:thetestwiki User:AndreasJS/test1
Getting 1 pages from thetestwiki:en...
>>> User:AndreasJS/test1 <<<
- Test Test Test Test Test Test Test test
+ Test Test Test Test Test Test Test Test test
Do you want to accept these changes? ([y]es, [N]o) y
WARNING: Your account on thetestwiki:en does not have a bot flag. Its edits will be visible in the recent changes and it may get blocked.
Changing page [[User:AndreasJS/test1]]
WARNING: Your account on thetestwiki:en does not have a bot flag. Its edits will be visible in the recent changes and it may get blocked.
ERROR: Unexpected response from wiki server.
302 (OK)
andreas-schwabs-computer-2:pywikipedia andreas$ python basic.py -lang:en -family:thetestwiki User:AndreasJS/test1
Getting 1 pages from thetestwiki:en...
>>> User:AndreasJS/test1 <<<
- Test Test Test Test Test Test Test Test test
+ Test Test Test Test Test Test Test Test Test test
Do you want to accept these changes? ([y]es, [N]o) y
WARNING: Your account on thetestwiki:en does not have a bot flag. Its edits will be visible in the recent changes and it may get blocked.
Sleeping for 5.6 seconds, 2010-02-04 18:40:21
Changing page [[User:AndreasJS/test1]]
WARNING: Your account on thetestwiki:en does not have a bot flag. Its edits will be visible in the recent changes and it may get blocked.
ERROR: Unexpected response from wiki server.
302 (OK)
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">
<head>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603140&aid=2946258&group_…
Feature Requests item #2884664, was opened at 2009-10-23 14:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xqt
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=2884664&group_…
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: interwiki
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Freeman-sr (freeman-sr)
Assigned to: xqt (xqt)
Summary: New iw sorting policy on sr.wp
Initial Comment:
Users of sr.wp have voted out their IW sorting policy that is different than this bot's default, on the following page:
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%…
This page links to two pages:
Discussion page, where was given an sorting algorithm proposal:
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%…
A page, where all IWs are sorted by this algorithm:
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%…
The attached file contains an array of these IWs. You will have to give a corresponding name to this array in order to use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: xqt (xqt)
Date: 2010-02-03 06:45
Message:
done in r7904
I cannot prevent other wikis using the same sorting order. But all changes
must be recorded on meta.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Freeman-sr (freeman-sr)
Date: 2010-02-02 19:50
Message:
Thank you for the engagement on this job. It is possible that no other wiki
is going to use a similar array, so it could be reconsidered whether to
keep it like that one the meta-page or not.
The pcd-wiki is well placed. I will now see what to do about examples.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: xqt (xqt)
Date: 2010-02-02 18:35
Message:
I've created a new array at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Interwiki_sorting_order#By_order_of_latin_al…
and added pcd-wiki.
Please confirm this sorting array and give some examples to the
description like the other two ways.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Freeman-sr (freeman-sr)
Date: 2010-02-01 23:48
Message:
I would direct you to the same page you mentioned, as you asked us to vote
out the policy.
http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0…
i.e.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interwiki_sorting_order&action=…
1) Does this suffice, or shall we translate a larger version, from the top
of this page?
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%…
2) May I ask how much longer is this going to take? I took yet more than
three months after having the policy voted out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: xqt (xqt)
Date: 2010-02-01 19:13
Message:
Could you please explain this type of sorting. Which are the rules for this
alorithm?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=2884664&group_…
Feature Requests item #2884664, was opened at 2009-10-23 14:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by freeman-sr
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=2884664&group_…
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: interwiki
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Freeman-sr (freeman-sr)
Assigned to: xqt (xqt)
Summary: New iw sorting policy on sr.wp
Initial Comment:
Users of sr.wp have voted out their IW sorting policy that is different than this bot's default, on the following page:
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%…
This page links to two pages:
Discussion page, where was given an sorting algorithm proposal:
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%…
A page, where all IWs are sorted by this algorithm:
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%…
The attached file contains an array of these IWs. You will have to give a corresponding name to this array in order to use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Freeman-sr (freeman-sr)
Date: 2010-02-02 19:50
Message:
Thank you for the engagement on this job. It is possible that no other wiki
is going to use a similar array, so it could be reconsidered whether to
keep it like that one the meta-page or not.
The pcd-wiki is well placed. I will now see what to do about examples.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: xqt (xqt)
Date: 2010-02-02 18:35
Message:
I've created a new array at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Interwiki_sorting_order#By_order_of_latin_al…
and added pcd-wiki.
Please confirm this sorting array and give some examples to the
description like the other two ways.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Freeman-sr (freeman-sr)
Date: 2010-02-01 23:48
Message:
I would direct you to the same page you mentioned, as you asked us to vote
out the policy.
http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0…
i.e.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interwiki_sorting_order&action=…
1) Does this suffice, or shall we translate a larger version, from the top
of this page?
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%…
2) May I ask how much longer is this going to take? I took yet more than
three months after having the policy voted out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: xqt (xqt)
Date: 2010-02-01 19:13
Message:
Could you please explain this type of sorting. Which are the rules for this
alorithm?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=2884664&group_…
Bugs item #2928239, was opened at 2010-01-08 12:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603138&aid=2928239&group_…
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: General
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: xqt (xqt)
Summary: unwarranted SectionError
Initial Comment:
> python version.py
Pywikipedia [http] trunk/pywikipedia (r7865, 2010/01/08, 07:29:30)
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jan 4 2009, 17:40:26)
[GCC 4.3.2]
On en.wikisource.org, this link:
[[Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007/Title XII#Sec. 1201.]]
generates a SectionError, making page.exists() return False, despite the section being good (try pasting the link into the search line an press "Go"). Possibly pywikipedia is confused by the long and short section IDs (the generated HTML code contains both
<span class="mw-headline" id="Sec._1201._Express_Loans_for_Renewable_Energy_and_Energy_Efficiency.">
and
<span id="Sec._1201.">
where the second span element is a subelement of the first one, so the CSS attribute class="mw-headline" still applies).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot)
Date: 2010-02-02 02:20
Message:
This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by
the administrator of this Tracker).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: xqt (xqt)
Date: 2010-01-18 16:28
Message:
We do not get this section neither via wikitext nor via api parse action. I
would not do some screen scrapping to get this stuff.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2010-01-18 10:37
Message:
It seems wikipedia.py uses the wikitext to search for sections instead of
the rendered HTML. This makes this bug difficult to fix for pages in which
sections are generated by remplates or anchors are defined manually.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603138&aid=2928239&group_…
Feature Requests item #2884664, was opened at 2009-10-23 14:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xqt
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=2884664&group_…
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: interwiki
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Freeman-sr (freeman-sr)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: New iw sorting policy on sr.wp
Initial Comment:
Users of sr.wp have voted out their IW sorting policy that is different than this bot's default, on the following page:
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%…
This page links to two pages:
Discussion page, where was given an sorting algorithm proposal:
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%…
A page, where all IWs are sorted by this algorithm:
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%…
The attached file contains an array of these IWs. You will have to give a corresponding name to this array in order to use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: xqt (xqt)
Date: 2010-02-01 19:13
Message:
Could you please explain this type of sorting. Which are the rules for this
alorithm?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=2884664&group_…
Feature Requests item #2942609, was opened at 2010-01-30 00:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xqt
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=2942609&group_…
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Interface Improvements
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Merlissimo (merlissimo)
>Assigned to: xqt (xqt)
Summary: add new summary to category.py /some user interface changes
Initial Comment:
+ add new category info to summary when replacing category
+ add list option to show option list again
+ short option list when same one is shown again
+ add m as key for showing more content (used by most other scripts)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: xqt (xqt)
Date: 2010-01-31 17:37
Message:
patch done in r7902. Thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=2942609&group_…
Feature Requests item #2942609, was opened at 2010-01-30 00:59
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by merlissimo
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=2942609&group_…
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Interface Improvements
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Merlissimo (merlissimo)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: add new summary to category.py /some user interface changes
Initial Comment:
+ add new category info to summary when replacing category
+ add list option to show option list again
+ short option list when same one is shown again
+ add m as key for showing more content (used by most other scripts)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=603141&aid=2942609&group_…