Nullzero added a comment.
If I don't misremember, the problem arises when I run two scripts simultaneously. Suppose two scripts are A and B, with A performing sysop actions (without botflag) and B performing bot actions (with botflag). It seems that some settings about botflag are shared somehow, so frequently B doesn't use botflag to edit. Thus edits appear in recentchanges.
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T57140
REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>.
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Nullzero
Cc: VcamX, jayvdb, Nullzero, Xqt, Legoktm, pywikipedia-bugs
Legoktm changed the title from "implement support for Flagged Revisions" to "implement support for Flagged Revisions in Pywikibot".
Legoktm set Security to None.
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T57081
REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>.
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Legoktm
Cc: Qgil, jayvdb, Legoktm, Ricordisamoa, pywikipedia-bugs
Jsalsman added a comment.
@qgil, this project is specified as strictly read-only relative to any wiki. It looks for configurable patterns to match facts and statistics, and when it finds them over a certain age, makes a list of them (not necessarily on the same wiki as they came from), prepares them in GIFT format for human review, presents those GIFT questions to human reviewers, and keeps track of the answers in a way that would optionally allow the same or a different human to fold them back in to the source wiki as correction edits, but does not require that final step. Is there anything that would prevent it being run on any Wikipedia? Is community approval necessary for any step of that specified process?
I copied the questions in the mediawiki.org page from the successful GSoC 2014 pages there. I did not know that the student applications should be here instead. Where do you want them? In the task description or in the comments? How will phabricator handle applications from multiple students?
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89416
REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>.
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Jsalsman
Cc: Halfak, NiharikaKohli, Evanontario, jayvdb, Qgil, Bawolff, Aklapper, Jsalsman, Svick, jeremyb, pywikipedia-bugs
Qgil added a comment.
In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89416#1053455, @Jsalsman wrote:
> @qgil, why do you say this would only make sense when applied to Wikimedia wikis? Is there something that would prevent, for example, Wikia wikis from using it to create an update backlog list?
I guess what I wanted to say is that this project makes sense if there is some guarantee that a successful delivery will end up being used in any significant wiki out there. Otherwise the expectations should be clearly set. Think that many students believe that because this is Wikimedia, successful GSoC projects will be deployed to (English) Wikipedia.
Also, I just saw in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Accuracy_review that you are proposing basically a parallel application process for interested students. GSoC has its own form, and we are asking them to duplicate it in Phabricator tasks (was in mediawiki.org pages). We cannot ask them to have a third channel proposed by mentors.
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89416
REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>.
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Qgil
Cc: Halfak, NiharikaKohli, Evanontario, jayvdb, Qgil, Bawolff, Aklapper, Jsalsman, Svick, jeremyb, pywikipedia-bugs
Jsalsman changed the title from "Wikipedia facts analysis with stale data detection" to "Out-of-date fact and statistics identification and review (was "accuracy review")".
Jsalsman edited the task description.
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89416
REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>.
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Jsalsman
Cc: Halfak, NiharikaKohli, Evanontario, jayvdb, Qgil, Bawolff, Aklapper, Jsalsman, Svick, jeremyb, pywikipedia-bugs
Jsalsman added a comment.
@jayvdb, yes, I'm sure this will work for Indonesian as specified. Please do ask their Wikipedia community if they agree to a trial run.
@qgil, why do you say this would only make sense when applied to Wikimedia wikis? Is there something that would prevent, for example, Wikia wikis from using it to create an update backlog list?
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89416
REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>.
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Jsalsman
Cc: Halfak, NiharikaKohli, Evanontario, jayvdb, Qgil, Bawolff, Aklapper, Jsalsman, Svick, jeremyb, pywikipedia-bugs