To quote it's talk page: "Does anyone even look at this page anymore?"
That's not a good sentiment...
DJ
On 20 aug. 2014, at 19:48, Mark Holmquist <mtraceur(a)member.fsf.org> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 04:52:01PM +0200, Andre
Klapper wrote:
I think mtraceur pinged me on IRC a while ago,
proposing an UploadWizard
bug triage. If I remembered correctly:
I did! It was mostly hypothetical, I also pinged some frequent community
contributors to try and see if we couldn't get some traction. I think
the time is approaching to actually plan this.
Any specific aspects or topic in mind? Some
general "let's retry random
reports if they are still valid"? Or more looking at priorities of
tickets?
A little of both, I think. Some things may have gotten fixed, other things
may need follow-ups, yet more things may need to be reprioritized.
If retesting reports: Would retesting take place
on
http://commons.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard , I
assume that the broken first image and the missing templates exposed in
the summary are "alright"? (Asking because this might confuse potential
volunteers trying to reproduce issues there.)
We could probably have people test on beta-commons, I don't see any reason
our testers wouldn't be able to test the rest of the pipeline even if the
tutorial is not there.
Thanks!