I’m considering this issue RC.
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
CSSMin.php is Apache 2.0 License
This is GPLv3+ compatible whereas the rest is GPLv2+ or compatible,
which means this should be not an issue, except for needing to
document that in debian/copyright. Please correct me if I’m wrong.
IEContentAnalyzer is non-free actually. "It may
be redistributed
without restriction" is missing some things we require for main.
Right. Tim Starling, you claim copyright on that file. Can you
please confirm which DFSG-free Open Source™ licence(s) we can
use and distribute that file under?
JavaScriptMinifier.php is Apache,MIT,GPL,LGPL - and so
falls under
GPL, but it wouldnt be bad to list the options it offers for users
looking into the copyright file. While you modify it anyways. :)
jsminplus is MPL1.1 or GPL or LGPL. Please list, for completness.
Aye. These weren’t an issue for the mediawiki package before the
split (which I still don’t agree with but will only passively
oppose).
I’ve got more:
IEUrlExtension.php does not have any licence at all. Is it safe
to assume it’s GPLv2+ as “all of the rest of MediaWiki”?
HttpStatus.php has no complaints ;-) it’s not code and certainly
not copyrightable.
I’ll be removing IEContentAnalyzer.php and IEUrlExtension.php
from MediaWiki in Debian within this month if I do not get
any positive feedback or a good reason to delay this.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
tarent solutions GmbH
Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn •
http://www.tarent.de/
Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-314
HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
Geschäftsführer: Boris Esser, Sebastian Mancke