Thanks, Rob.

I have now asked Ori, Lydia, Timo, and Kunal a few times to reply to http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2014-July/077554.html re RCStream. Timo has updated the RfC https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Requests_for_comment%2FPublishin... . Krinkle mentioned to me in IRC:

<Krinkle> sumanah: The RCStream wiki page documents the implemented code. The code has been implemented, moved into gerrit, reviewed by peers, approved by ops, and is already live in production. It hasn't been publicly launched widely, but you can consider it a public beta.

So Tim, if you would like more discussion of the RCStream proposal, it might be best for you to mention that directly.

Sumana Harihareswara Senior Technical Writer Wikimedia Foundation

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Rob Lanphier robla@wikimedia.org wrote:

Hi Sumana,

I asked around about priorities on RFCs in MediaWiki Core's weekly meeting. Nothing popped up, but I made it clear that I plan to be persistent with that question.

I specifically asked about the RCStream RFC, and Tim suggested it does need more discussion. Link for your convenience:

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Publishing_the_RecentCha...

We also briefly discussed Structured Logging. It's mainly blocked on the Composer RFC. Once that's done, the structured logging RFC seems to have received adequate review for now; any remaining conversation can happen in the normal course of code review of the structured logging implementation, which is pretty much done.

Rob