Hello!
Quick status (mainly for Tomasz). We took some time with Stas to go over what needs to be done on WDQS. Blazegraph seems robust enough and standard enough. I'll start playing around with it...
The list of open points that I should address seems fairly thin. No upgrade planned in the short term, no specific maintenance, ... I can try to take care of incidents on the service, but it does not seems that there are many.
In short: I should not have any problem starting to work on WDQS, but I'm not sure it will free all that much time from Stas...
We'll see...
MrG
Thanks for the update Guillaume
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Guillaume Lederrey glederrey@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hello!
Quick status (mainly for Tomasz). We took some time with Stas to go over what needs to be done on WDQS. Blazegraph seems robust enough and standard enough. I'll start playing around with it...
The list of open points that I should address seems fairly thin. No upgrade planned in the short term, no specific maintenance, ... I can try to take care of incidents on the service, but it does not seems that there are many.
In short: I should not have any problem starting to work on WDQS, but I'm not sure it will free all that much time from Stas...
We'll see...
MrG
-- Guillaume Lederrey Operations Engineer, Discovery Wikimedia Foundation
discovery mailing list discovery@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery