On Billinghurst's point I would really love to see the changes that have been successful tested on (particularly) Wikisource, where I imagine that the dropdown metadata could be tremendously valuable.
On 25 January 2016 at 07:42, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
I really like this idea but I'd recommend we use it for more qualitative than quantitative feedback, unless we have a solid plan to surface the labs page to a good sample of users.
On 23 January 2016 at 00:07, Dan Garry dgarry@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 22 January 2016 at 20:43, Julien Girault jgirault@wikimedia.org wrote:
Thank you for jumping on this, though the aim of this thread was to have a discussion and move forward (with this kind of technical operations) only once we get a common feeling that this is a good idea and we figured out the concerns that people may have.
Nonetheless, I'm sure removing this is just as easy as setting it up, so I don't see any harm for now.
Yeah, these things can be pulled down and replaced with something else with just a few console commands, so I don't think there's any problems here either. :-)
Dan
-- Dan Garry Lead Product Manager, Discovery Wikimedia Foundation
discovery mailing list discovery@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery
-- Oliver Keyes Count Logula Wikimedia Foundation