OK, thanks for the response.
On another note, I recently learned that the purpose of the beta features
extension is to allow extensions to be tested before they can be pushed to
production. This means that after some time (I think, 6 months) we will
have to promote to stable or dismantle the WikiLabels extension. I don't
think promoting is an option as not everyone needs this feature. So I was
wondering if we still want to move the functionality from the gadget to an
extension.
Baha
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:09:38 -0500, Aaron Halfaker
<aaron.halfaker(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Right now, we build some of that JS based on configuration parameters
> that
> are needed by the WikiLabels service back-end. It seems that it would be
> easiest to generate those files and cache them so that we can serve with
> them extension code.
>
> I'm not sure how much sense this makes long-term. If the answer is "no
> sense -- at all", then I think our next step would be getting a good
> description of which parts of that JS are configured and then working on
> a
> proposal for how we'd change things within the extension. I can do the
> description if we get that far.
>
> -Aaron
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Bahodir Mansurov
> <bmansurov(a)wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> As I was working on the WikiLabels extension, I had to copy over a lot
>> of
>> CSS and JavaScript files to the extension folder. I suppose it's fine by
>> itself, but I was wondering if those files will continue to be used
>> outside
>> the extension? If so, we should keep them where they are and load them
>> dynamically in the extension (as it's done in the gadget). What do you
>> think?
>>
>> --
>> Baha
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AI mailing list
>> AI(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai
>>
--
Baha
Hello,
As I was working on the WikiLabels extension, I had to copy over a lot of
CSS and JavaScript files to the extension folder. I suppose it's fine by
itself, but I was wondering if those files will continue to be used
outside the extension? If so, we should keep them where they are and load
them dynamically in the extension (as it's done in the gadget). What do
you think?
--
Baha
Hey folks,
Thanks for signing up for this mailing list! I'm still waiting on a few
more people to join up before I post a big welcome. Hopefully that'll
happen on Saturday, Dec. 26th.
In the meantime, enjoy your holidays or quiet work days!
-Aaron