-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Platonides wrote:
Can we do
temporary edits to the template to make it semi-functional
(only a couple of switchs), or it can't be touched until you finish
investigating?
It's 5 days since this reminding, a week since the slowness. We're
missing the
funcionality it provided. So, is there any reason blocking from
restoring it?
(if so, why hasn't been resolved yet? :D)
There was a 'policy' of users don't needing to worry about server issues
('if there aren't enough servers, we will add more'), but here there is
a collision.
Jesus Christ!
I can't say words without having some God-given "policy" read into them.
I made a general recommendation not to go running around saying THE SKY
IS FALLING THE SKY IS FALLING about templates BASED ON SUPPOSITION AND
PARANOIA.
That doesn't mean that AN ACTUAL PROBLEM, WHEN DISCOVERED, SHOULD BE
IGNORED.
WHEN THERE IS AN ACTUAL, REAL, MEASURABLE PROBLEM, THEN IT MATTERS.
IN THIS CASE THERE IS AN ACTUAL, REAL, MEASURABLE PROBLEM.
UNTIL THAT GETS FIXED UP ON THE SOFTWARE END, THE PARTICULAR TEMPLATE
WHICH IS AN ACTUAL, REAL, MEASURABLE PROBLEM, TAKING 10-20 SECONDS TO
RENDER, MUST NOT BE WIDELY USED.
Try to use some common sense, people.
There's no "policy" here. Just *sense*.
- -- brion vibber (brion @
pobox.com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFrTZ5wRnhpk1wk44RAm20AKDOOw0muLgX/Zc6PBA+ghuyajbV2wCg2UM/
pYPy5UjcDDZB6g2gkTSiuO8=
=zNMT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----