In case anyone is interested in the content of the draft Annual Plan, there is plenty of
discussion on the talk page and any editor in good standing can participate. The principal
commentators on the talk page so far have been Nemo and I. Regardless of which
organization does the staff assessment I think the discussion on the talk page is valuable
and I encourage more people to review the plan and make comments. It would be good to have
more diversity. If anyone has concerns about the plan's content, now is the time to
say so. (: We're having a good discussion, please join us.
I'm glad WMF made the draft available for comment from the community, FDC, and other
Wikimedia organizations.
Pine