In case anyone is interested in the content of the draft Annual Plan, there is plenty of discussion on the talk page and any editor in good standing can participate. The principal commentators on the talk page so far have been Nemo and I. Regardless of which organization does the staff assessment I think the discussion on the talk page is valuable and I encourage more people to review the plan and make comments. It would be good to have more diversity. If anyone has concerns about the plan's content, now is the time to say so. (: We're having a good discussion, please join us. I'm glad WMF made the draft available for comment from the community, FDC, and other Wikimedia organizations. Pine