[WikiEN-l] Annoying hatnotes

[stevertigo]

Keegan Paul<kgnpaul at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:05 PM, <WJhonson at aol.com> wrote:
>>  I don't however see the
>> whole mountainish molehill if there is only one link at the top.

> From what I'm understanding and agree with, the molehill is not the issue
> over disambig pages.  The initial issue is that someone looking up plankton
> would have seen a "See also Spongebob" link.  The perception by people
> looking up plankton will be to already question the validity of the
> editorial content if Spongebob is the first thing they see.  Correct me if
> I'm wrong about this being the initial issue, Carcharoth.

Right. Its not about the number of clicks, or even the presence of
alternative linkages - its about the odd and irritating addition of
links to trivial topics at the top of substantive articles (hence the
term "trivial disambiguation" or "trivial otheruses links").