[WikiEN-l] Edward Doran

[WJhonson at aol.com]

In a message dated 4/23/2009 5:59:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk writes:


> On a related note, an interesting issue I came across the other day is
> where my limited primary research - a detail found when I was trying
> to confirm something else - appears to *explicitly* contradict the
> secondary sources. What d'you do there?
> 
> a) Leave it alone, and put a note on the talkpage?
> b) Quote the standard interpretation of things, add a footnote about
> the odd result?
> c) Decide the secondary sources are wrong, quote the primary source?>>

-------------------

Andrew I agree with you, I like B) myself as well.

Will Johnson




**************
Big savings on Dell XPS Laptops and Desktops! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219799634x1201361008/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fad.doubl
eclick.net%2Fclk%3B214133440%3B36002254%3Bj)